Would the FIA be able to give further punishment to Vettel in theory?
Not that it would actually happen mind you.
If hammy or any other driver for that fact rammed someone in rage would 100% get a stiffer penalty than a pathetic 10 second.
deliberate road rage like that, when there's no question of an accidental mistake or anything else, should be toughest penalty which is DQBut during the race, isn't the next penalty level disqualification, after a 10 second stop 'n' go? +25 secs (like Lewis got in Spa a few years back) after the race would have cost less time?
where's the option for FIA are a joke and ruining the sport?Poll added
I try to keep the polls pretty serious in here. Although I was tempted to change "10" to "Vettel smash"where's the option for FIA are a joke and ruining the sport?
Who the **** gave that 1/10?
that is serious. it was so obvious what happened.I try to keep the polls pretty serious in here. Although I was tempted to change "10" to "Vettel smash"
Who the **** gave that 1/10?
I try to keep the polls pretty serious in here. Although I was tempted to change "10" to "Vettel smash"
CaptainRAVE and cu3ed
Same. It wasn't a traditionally great race but for entertainment and controversy it's up there.I gave it a 10 for entertainment value. I love crazy races where nobody in the world would have predicted the podium.
I don't know if it was deliberate or not because you would have to be pretty stupid to do that deliberatelydeliberate road rage like that, when there's no question of an accidental mistake or anything else, should be toughest penalty which is DQ