Vettel finally takes responsibility and admits his actions, apologises, gets off scott-free with no meaningful punishment. What a corrupt, spineless, surprise. Makes FIFA look like a paragon of virtue and honesty. I think I might be done with F1.
I'll say it again - there is no such thing as a grid box, or any other term, in the regulations. The 'box' aspect is only a visual help for the drivers.So if in a red car, this year it's now ok to not start in your grid box and hit your main rival twice under safety car conditions.
Don't be silly, that is punishable by a 5 second time penalty!So what do you actually have to do to get DQ then? Get out of your car and punch someone in the face?
Vettel finally takes responsibility and admits his actions, apologises, gets off scott-free with no meaningful punishment. What a corrupt, spineless, surprise. Makes FIFA look like a paragon of virtue and honesty. I think I might be done with F1.
Are you saying drivers can start anywhere along that line?I'll say it again - there is no such thing as a grid box, or any other term, in the regulations. The 'box' aspect is only a visual help for the drivers.
I'm only saying that there isn't any reference to any box or anything stopping a driver from positioning himself outside of that box (or wasn't - but it will be in a different colour if it has been amended since).Are you saying drivers can start anywhere along that line?
Heh, no you wont.
How far does that line extend though? To the middle of the track? I always thought you had to be in your box.I'm only saying that there isn't any reference to any box or anything stopping a driver from positioning himself outside of that box (or wasn't - but it will be in a different colour if it has been amended since).
I assume that as long as he's parked along his line (so not obstructing fellow competitors) then it is OK, but I guess it was clarified in the following driver's briefing.
Vettel finally takes responsibility and admits his actions, apologises, gets off scott-free with no meaningful punishment. What a corrupt, spineless, surprise. Makes FIFA look like a paragon of virtue and honesty. I think I might be done with F1.
Lol no further action, so the clearest ever rage crash results in a 10sec stop go. Is there even a point in having a dq rule.
Not only that the penalty was choosen when ham had his problem and they saw it would leave them side by side on track. I really do dispear with so much of F1 politics and rules.
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/130540/four-key-questions-from-the-vettel-verdict
yep all though such nonsense did take place in the past, like when Senna was DQ. I thought they were getting better in that regard but still incompetent. Bu obviously just had a lack of opportunity. Now its incompetence and wwe.I've been saying for a while it's become WWE on wheels which is disappointing for those who remember the old days when it was about pure racing.
If it had been the penultimate race you can bet the FIA would have DQ Vettel from Baqu so that they went into the last race on equal points, they enforce rules based upon what they think is the best for 'show'.