The Telsa regression as a car manufacturer continues, model S and X have been binned off in favour of an Optimus robot production line.
They are now a 2 car plus a mad truck no one buys manufacturer. Nuts.
*For now.Tbf I don't think they do too badly with just those two models. Sure they both make the top 15 best selling vehicles globally?
*For now.
That's the caveat though. Whilst Tesla treads water or slowly innovates, it's competitors are surely catching up/passing it.
I read the BBC report. Maybe it doesn't go in to enough detail but the summary seems to be:The Telsa regression as a car manufacturer continues, model S and X have been binned off in favour of an Optimus robot production line.
They are now a 2 car plus a mad truck no one buys manufacturer. Nuts.
cphpost.dk
Could it also be down to the fact they never have to be serviced if the owner doesn't fancy it, so things that would get picked up in the possibly 3/4 services other EVs have had in that time just get missed.I wonder how the Model Ys fare here in the UK considering they are reaching their first MOT age here. I do know that typically older Tesla’s were renowned for poor build quality and that is reflected in a generally higher MOT 1st failure rate. But 45% at 4 years is shocking. I know the UK is 3 years (4 in N Ireland), so the typical 23% failure rates for 3 year old Model 3s is also poor.
45% of Tesla Model Y failed inspection last year - The Copenhagen Post
According to an analysis of inspection data by FDM, nearly half of Tesla’s popular Model Y cars failed their mandatory inspections last year. Specifically, of the 2,394 Model Y cars from 2021 that were inspected for the first time last year, 1,069 failed, resulting in a failure rate of 45%...cphpost.dk
![]()
Nearly Half of Teslas Fail Inspection in Denmark
Almost 50 percent of Teslas in Denmark flunk recent safety inspections, spotlighting recurring faults in braking, lighting and suspension. These findings fuel fresh concerns about Tesla’s build quality and reliability in Europe’s fast-growing EV market.thedanishdream.com
Allegedly similarly high failure rates for Model Ys in Belgium and Germany. The Model 3 failure rates were 33% for the same age allegedly.
How many miles do the fronts last?
I am no expert so if someone wants to tell me I am talking .... so be it, but I was under the impression that because the power delivery of an EV was incredibly smooth and almost uniformNot sure if I've missed something as it goes without saying in this context but EVs are typically more demanding on tyres due to the application of torque (depends a bit on settings and driving style), the traction control/ESP can modulate torque/power balance across the wheels more than an order of magnitude more effectively than an ICE due to the motor control but that also puts more demand on the tyres and regen also puts demand on the tyres you typically don't get with an ICE where the wear is bias towards the brakes instead..
I was about to post effectively this, the first MOT is probably the first time anyone will have ever looked at anything other than than washing it.Could it also be down to the fact they never have to be serviced if the owner doesn't fancy it, so things that would get picked up in the possibly 3/4 services other EVs have had in that time just get missed.
I am no expert so if someone wants to tell me I am talking .... so be it, but I was under the impression that because the power delivery of an EV was incredibly smooth and almost uniform
compared to a performant ICE vehicle which have a surge of torque in very narrow bands (so kind of jolting the car when driven aggressively on gear changes) that clams that the general higher torque of an EV cause excess tyre and increase road wear and tear was not so simple.
(for instance in the wet or ice in my nissan 350z even with traction control I would sometimes wheel spin slightly, however I don't think I have ever done that in my ipace or my wife's i3) -maybe I just don't drive hard enough any more post child and now over the hill.
as for regen. surely it depends how it is set up? I used to have 1 pedal driving on my ipace but I turned it off as I decided I enjoy it more without it.
now my car "coasts" almost the same as an ICE car with the regen very light to simulate engine braking....... the regen only kicks in more forcefully when I put my foot on the brake, so any tyre work would surely be the same as with an ICE at that point ?
@Rroff
In theory maybe, in practise I was permanently using the fun pedal on my Polestar 2 which had about 460 bhp and never had to change the tyres in 25k miles other than a puncture in one.
I am no expert so if someone wants to tell me I am talking .... so be it, but I was under the impression that because the power delivery of an EV was incredibly smooth and almost uniform
compared to a performant ICE vehicle which have a surge of torque in very narrow bands (so kind of jolting the car when driven aggressively on gear changes) that clams that the general higher torque of an EV cause excess tyre and increase road wear and tear was not so simple.
(for instance in the wet or ice in my nissan 350z even with traction control I would sometimes wheel spin slightly, however I don't think I have ever done that in my ipace or my wife's i3) -maybe I just don't drive hard enough any more post child and now over the hill.
as for regen. surely it depends how it is set up? I used to have 1 pedal driving on my ipace but I turned it off as I decided I enjoy it more without it.
now my car "coasts" almost the same as an ICE car with the regen very light to simulate engine braking....... the regen only kicks in more forcefully when I put my foot on the brake, so any tyre work would surely be the same as with an ICE at that point ?
even if true at what point does it not really matter any more.But how many miles would you have got out of the same tyres on an approx. equivalent ICE in comparison? I'm not saying tyres don't last long on an EV but they do when all else is equal tend to wear quicker and EVs are definitely less forgiving if you chuck just any old tyres on them than an ICE would be.
even if true at what point does it not really matter any more.
are you talking at it from a financial perspective or environmental?.
if financial then - esp now EVs are close to purchase parity with ICE cars when new then - at least until the government start taxing them per mile - and assuming they don't somehow also hammer fuel costs more as well - then any increased costs due to a few less miles on tyres will be more than covered by not needing to worry about exhaust systems, cambelts, brake disks/ pads etc.
and if talking environmental then again any reduced brake dust and zero tail pipe emissions should more than cover that !.
when I got my 1st EV I must admit I was worried after reading all the horror stories and yet 3 years in I have bought 1 set of tyres and they still have loads of tread in them. (when I bought it I tried to get the seller to replace the tyres as they were past their best, and yet they lasted 18 months.
my wife's i3 is RWD and has pram wheels and I must admit am not expecting them to last that long, that said in almost 20,000 miles we have only replaced the rear tyres once, not touched the front and the rears were far from full tread when we bought the car, and still have plenty of life left in them.
I dunno what people expect out of car tyres so good wear from 1 person may not be the same to another... but if I can get 30,000 miles out of my ipace on a set and 20000 out of the rears on the i3 (and more on the front) I am not gonna grumble.
biggest threat to longevity of our tyres ICE or EV is the state of our roads imo
Lots of traction control intervention wears out BRAKES not tyres.