It's more like the smartphone vs. feature phone argument TBH.
If you take your comparison, some early adopters were willing to get on board with the original iPhone or various Android phone(s), and others were happy to stick with the long trusted Nokia that had a week of battery life, and made calls, and completed SMS. Why would they need more, why would they want worse battery life etc.
I wasn't going to go that route because some people may consider that as meaning BEVs and ICE are two very different products, rather than a change in the drivetrain.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8852d/8852d2062d7110393ceea768b048b31c5d4853ef" alt="Stick Out Tongue :p :p"
But for that example, the original iPhone didn't have 3G, didn't send picture messages, didn't have the "ecosystem" and was by and large worse as a phone (or camera) than the feature phones of the same era. Some people could overlook that because they were more interested in the wifi internet browsing, but many others couldn't. That's the point I'm making.
The latest electric vehicles are now at the iPhone 3G phase for a lot of people. Better, but still a compromise for a lot of people, especially when they cost a significant amount more than the phone they had.
Now, if you were a Nokia smartphone user, used to spending £500 on a phone, or it was paid for by work, and used as a work tool then sure, the iPhone 3G may have been a good option for you (this being the Model 3 vs the BMW saloon analogy).
Next generation of electric vehicles (available in the next year or two) will be like the iPhone 4/5 and the later Android models and sales will take off. Hopefully the iD.3 and 4, along with others from other manufacturers will be those vehicles.