EV general discussion

Has anyone considered that I just massively **** up with the man maths? A couple did but you know it’s been an amusing read for the last little while so I thought I’d just let it run.

As has been said lots of times, the hidden cost on the NHS scheme is the unknown pension cost because the hit is entirely dependent on how long you live.

Say the gross is £8,800 per year per @Minstadave example:

NHS and other public sector staff accrue pensions at 1/54 of their career salary, paid annually. It’s also inflation linked so todays value is the same as tomorrows value in ‘real’ terms.

£8,800 X 3 years = £26,400 sacrificed.

£26,400 X (1/54) = £489 pension lost every year.

Say you start drawing at 60 when the scheme allows and you live until your 80, so 20 years. 20 x £489 = £9,780 lost over that period. So an extra £272/month of hidden cost for the period of the lease. If you add that to the £413 ‘net’, suddenly it doesn’t look so attractive.

The longer you live the most it costs, if you die at 61, well the pension hit is the least of your concerns. But if you lived for 20 years, you’d have saved a whole £52 a month doing it.

Some people are fine with that and that’s all good.

The issue is most people wouldn’t even realise until they check their pension statements in 6 years and it’s not growing as fast as expected.

Those people might have saved £X00/month on the for the period of the salary sacrifice but in reality, if the salary sacrifice didn’t exist, they wouldn’t have spent anything like the gross amount on a car and would probably spend something closer to the ‘net’ amount. The money ‘saved’ probably wasn’t saved/invested either, it was probably spent on Netflix, Sky TV, take away coffee while charging, Avocado on toast and <insert anything else which boomers suggest young people are wasting they money on here> in the meantime.

Say you do 4 of these on the bounce over 12 years. All of a sudden your pension is £2000/year smaller and it is now £40k you don’t have after you retire.

The above only really applies to those with defined benefit pensions, other people need not worry about it as much.
 
Last edited:
I have a DB (now closed mind you) and this isn’t an issue, is this NHS specific? Other benefits are taken gross too like matching share schemes but no impact to the final salary. (Let’s not mention the non RPI linked rise though as it was froze at salary at closure)
 
Last edited:
Has anyone considered that I just massively **** up with the man maths? A couple did but you know it’s been an amusing read for the last little while so I thought I’d just let it run.

As has been said lots of times, the hidden cost on the NHS scheme is the unknown pension cost because the hit is entirely dependent on how long you live.

Say the gross is £8,800 per year per @Minstadave example:

NHS and other public sector staff accrue pensions at 1/54 of their career salary, paid annually. It’s also inflation linked so todays value is the same as tomorrows value in ‘real’ terms.

£8,800 X 3 years = £26,400 sacrificed.

£26,400 X (1/54) = £489 pension lost every year.

Say you start drawing at 60 when the scheme allows and you live until your 80, so 20 years. 20 x £489 = £9,780 lost over that period. So an extra £272/month of hidden cost for the period of the lease. If you add that to the £413 ‘net’, suddenly it doesn’t look so attractive.

The longer you live the most it costs, if you die at 61, well the pension hit is the least of your concerns. But if you lived for 20 years, you’d have saved a whole £52 a month doing it.

Some people are fine with that and that’s all good.

The issue is most people wouldn’t even realise until they check their pension statements in 6 years and it’s not growing as fast as expected.

Those people might have saved £X00/month on the for the period of the salary sacrifice but in reality, if the salary sacrifice didn’t exist, they wouldn’t have spent anything like the gross amount on a car and would probably spend something closer to the ‘net’ amount. The money ‘saved’ probably wasn’t saved/invested either, it was probably spent on Netflix, Sky TV, take away coffee while charging, Avocado on toast and <insert anything else which boomers suggest young people are wasting they money on here> in the meantime.

Say you do 4 of these on the bounce over 12 years. All of a sudden your pension is £2000/year smaller and it is now £40k you don’t have after you retire.

The above only really applies to those with defined benefit pensions, other people need not worry about it as much.
Interesting post, it was one of the reasons I decided not to get a car from the NHS scheme, even though I would love an EV. In your example
8,800 X 3 years = £26,400 sacrificed
Wouldn't it be even more due to the NHS pension contributions from the NHS trust?
 
Last edited:
Wouldn't it be even more due to the NHS pension contributions from the NHS trust?
No, the pension ‘contributions’ have zero bearing on what is actually accrued/paid by the pension scheme.

Government/public sector employers don’t actually make pension contributions on your behalf. These pensions are ‘un-funded’ in that existing employee contributions are just paying for existing retirees and shortfalls/surpluses are just washed through the employers budget. Basically, and additional money needed just comes from central or council taxation depending on which bit of the public sector you work in.

When public sector jobs say ‘the employer contributes an equivalent of 23%’ or some other high %, it’s just a made up number to suggest what it’s ‘worth’ in the private sector. They don’t actually pay it as there is no actual pension fund.

I’m not surprised the NHS goes out of its way to get good deals for its employees as they realise most of the benefit. It costs them a small amount of HR admin time now but it saves them an absolute fortune on their future pension liabilities.

The private sector is very different to public as their schemes are funded. Under a private sector defined benefit scheme pension scheme, there is a fund which the employer pays into which is invested. A lot of them have gotten into trouble over the years because the companies were not putting enough money in to sustain the fund leading to shortfalls (e.g. BHS). Most private sector defined benefit schemes caused years ago because they couldn’t be sustained.
 
Last edited:
forgot to mention earlier whilst I was driving down to Heathrow the EQC picked the first stop at a IONITY near Leeds, pulled up 1 spare bay, great, tried my Mercedes Me card came up with not authorised, tried my company credit card, not authorised, tried my debit card and the same, i was about to pull away and a gentleman next to me in a MG (I think) asked if I was having problems. Explained what was happening and he swiped his Octopus card and it started to charge straight away, he didnt even ask for any money but I insisted on giving him something, shows there are still some good people out there :) Obviously I gave him some money regardless but I was taken back a bit by his genuine kindness
What a nice guy.

Just FYI, it’s always worth phoning Ionity, I had issues on our very first charge with the VW 2 years ago, my fault the VW card needed activating before use, but I called Ionity and I was amazed when the kind CS person just started the charge remotely and that was free.
 
Something could actually be £400 net if you are in the £100-125k bracket and also are facing a reduction in personal allowance which effectively acts as a £60% tax rate
 
Something could actually be £400 net if you are in the £100-125k bracket and also are facing a reduction in personal allowance which effectively acts as a £60% tax rate
Indeed.. that was covered by the 'not a consultant' comment which implied being in that salary bracket..

Still the amazingly generous SS rates just seem to be rando public sector workers getting such egregious discounts on their scheme.. you know the rest of us schmucks will be paying for that somehow*..

* - I doubt any egregious discount scheme makes up for the other conditions of course, I'm clearly just a bit jealous of those rates!
 
Still the amazingly generous SS rates just seem to be rando public sector workers getting such egregious discounts on their scheme.. you know the rest of us schmucks will be paying for that somehow*..
Must be bulk buying power too... over a million staff must give you some leverage in negotiations lol
 
Indeed.. that was covered by the 'not a consultant' comment which implied being in that salary bracket..

Still the amazingly generous SS rates just seem to be rando public sector workers getting such egregious discounts on their scheme.. you know the rest of us schmucks will be paying for that somehow*..


* - I doubt any egregious discount scheme makes up for the other conditions of course, I'm clearly just a bit jealous of those rates!

Ill keep quiet :):D
 
Last edited:
Something could actually be £400 net if you are in the £100-125k bracket and also are facing a reduction in personal allowance which effectively acts as a £60% tax rate
Indeed but I wasn’t sure if that was a sensible wage or not. Seems ‘man maths’ is now also for maths errors too

Are you seeing the reason for so many EV sales now? It’s a no brainer with 2% BIK. And the more you earn the cheaper they are per month.
 
Last edited:
I've been trying to do man math's to compare annual cost of running my Toyota Rav4 Hybrid against a possible future purchase of a Tesla M3LR.

I thought on paper the savings would be bigger so I'm asking if I have gone wrong somewhere with my calculations.

Ive taken my annual mileage as 8,000. My Rav4 economy as 45mpg. Ive broken down Insurance cost to monthly and a tyres plus fund for additional expenditure on car.

My calculations are:

Tesla M3LR

Electricity – 8,000 miles a year @9p a kw = £201 per year= £17 month
Tyres plus: £60/month
Tax: €0
Insurance: £55/month:
Servicing: zero

Total: £132/month to drive Tesla Annual Total £1584

Rav4 Hybrid

Fuel: 8,000 miles a year = 22m a day = £1.35 litre = £1.048 per year = £88 month
Tyres plus: £60/month
Tax: from above budget (pay £580)
Insurance: £32/month
Service Plan: £30/month:

Total: £210/month to drive a Rav4. Annual Total £2520 a year

Difference: £78/month or £936/year or £4,680 over 5 years.
 
Why servicing as £0 on the Tesla? There's still stuff to go through isn't there?

I'd also consider adding some cost to the kWh charge, unless you can guarantee you're going only charging at home for the entire 8,000 miles. Public charging expensive so could drag up that kWh cost even with just a few charges here and there.
 
Last edited:
Why servicing as £0 on the Tesla? There's still stuff to go through isn't there?

I'd also consider adding some cost to the kWh charge, unless you can guarantee you're going only charging at home for the entire 8,000 miles. Public charging expensive so could drag up that kWh cost even with just a few charges here and there.
I thought Tesla had a no service needed policy? Sounds like Im wrong there.
Where are you getting fuel for £1.35?
Costco often even cheaper. Its £128.9 today
 
Why servicing as £0 on the Tesla? There's still stuff to go through isn't there?

I'd also consider adding some cost to the kWh charge, unless you can guarantee you're going only charging at home for the entire 8,000 miles. Public charging expensive so could drag up that kWh cost even with just a few charges here and there.

There is no defined service schedule on Tesla's. They recommend Cabin filter every year (or 2 years) and similar for the brake fluid but there is no "every 10,000 miles or 1 year".

That said assuming you follow the recommendations then there will be costs to spread over the time period.


This reminds me that I need to book mine in for the 4 year brake fluid test/replacement.
 
I've been trying to do man math's to compare annual cost of running my Toyota Rav4 Hybrid against a possible future purchase of a Tesla M3LR.
probably got the 40K premium car tax in that equation too, if its a young car .... and, not to forget, depreciation per mile.

--------------
leasing companies V
1.2. Leasing companies are extremely profitable2021 was a record year for leasing companies with €2.6 billion in profits for the top three leasingcompanies (Table 1, note that many of the captive leasing companies do not report separate financialaccounts). This record is unlikely to last, however, as year-on-year profits for the first half of 2022 nearlydoubled for ALD (+71%),5 Arval (+87%),6 and Leaseplan (+93%).7 Profits are now over €3,000 per car sold.81
 
I’d highly recommend the standard range 3 over the LR. It’s got more than enough range particularly at that milage and you get the latest 60kwh battery version (from December 2021). It also charges pretty quickly (up to 170kw peak).

I did 14k in the first year of owning the SR, mostly long journeys (didn’t get used to commute) and I never felt short of range.

Tyres seem expensive at £60/month for both cars. I just flogged my 2 year old model 3 had plenty of life left on the original tyres at 24k. Budget £220-£250 a corner for OEM but at £60/month you’ll have over >£2k saved up after 3-4years. If you’re sensible, they’ll last 28k-30k. Cheaper rubber is also available.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom