• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

EVGA terminates relationship with NVIDIA

Don't really care. Profits were nice during pandemic and mining times, now comes the final check. Pay it or get out. For sure AIBs couldn't be more happy with the prices those cards sold for.
 
I went and had a look for it and found this https://www.twobirds.com/en/insights/2020/global/retail-price-maintenance-in-the-eu

But, if nvidia are charging high prices for the gpus that kind of determines the prices retailers will sell for.
That doesn't seem as robust as it first appears. The EU can't force Nvidia to do business with who they don't want to, so if a company steps out of line, Nvidia will just magically not talk to them when the next GPUs launches.
 
That doesn't seem as robust as it first appears. The EU can't force Nvidia to do business with who they don't want to, so if a company steps out of line, Nvidia will just magically not talk to them when the next GPUs launches.
Wonder if that would fall under intimidation?
 
So you're saying Gibbo was lying then and OCUK were adding 1k+ onto the Gpus?

How do you explain companies like MSI, Gigabyte and ASUS all making record profits at the same time the Gpus were hugely inflated?

Also if nvidia was unwilling to cut AIBs pricing then how come their own margins dropped from over 65% to around 43% in their last earnings report.


That is simple maths.

10% of X is less than 10% of 2X.

They may make double the $ but it is still 10% margin.
 
Wonder if that would fall under intimidation?
I think it does but outside of a fine what can the EU do? Lets say company X was selling 3000 series cards for what ever they want Nvidia would still sell boards to them to stay on the right side of the law.
Nvidia will just ghost and block company x just as the 4000 series comes along.
 
ya, this. Maxwell was just "reference"

XUfYNA8.jpg
nope, was the 700 series
 
You can also increase your margins by cutting out the middle man, or middle men, a distributor would also take their cut as well as AIB's for their own cooler / board designs.

It can be good if those cost savings are passed on to the consumer, and it would seem currently that's what Nvidia are doing, the FE cards are cheaper, 3090 FE $1,100, EVGA are losing money on a $1,300 3090.

It is temporary because they have oversupply. They are certainly not passing on cost savings to customers from cutting out middlemen, there just cutting prices trying to/struggling to shift them.
It might 'business' but its still bad form to torpedo your business partners. Are Nividia that desperate? Probably, can't take a hit to the stock price after all.
 
Last edited:
I think it does but outside of a fine what can the EU do? Lets say company X was selling 3000 series cards for what ever they want Nvidia would still sell boards to them to stay on the right side of the law.
Nvidia will just ghost and block company x just as the 4000 series comes along.

no it doesn't. nVidia can't stop supplying a company if they don't sell at a particular price. That would be illegal as well. There have been some high profile cases of it in the last 20 years.
 
Do you have a link for these cases?

Its called resale price maintenance.





 
nope, was the 700 series

I think the point is more that Nvidia always had a reference design, even going back to the very earliest days of their cards. But you could never buy a reference design directly from Nvidia. You couldn’t with the 700 series either - you had to buy them from AIB’s.
 
Its called resale price maintenance.






Good read that and always refreshing when people link evidence to backup their posts :cool:
 
Back
Top Bottom