So when those cars don't put their brake lights on but the one in front of you does an emergency stop and you smash into the back of him what do you say?

So when those cars don't put their brake lights on but the one in front of you does an emergency stop and you smash into the back of him what do you say?

[TW]Fox;11837301 said:No, you cant go past at 70 on an otherwise reasonably clear Motorway becuase some plank is sitting in the middle lane.
you can if you dont change lanes in doing so.
[TW]Fox;11837677 said:No you cannot. Read the highway code.
someone posted the section earlier.
[TW]Fox;11837719 said:And I quoted it. It applies to situations whereby the road is busy and there are 3 lanes of queuing traffic. It does not apply to otherwise reasonably clear Motorways with morons sitting in the middle lane.
[TW]Fox;11837741 said:How about you try it and argue it out with the police officer. I'm telling you that you can't![]()

Theres no such thing, you really shouldnt be driving if you dont know the law.
Edit: If the middle land is doing 80, inside they are doing 60 with no real large spaces and moving faster on the outside (outside being by the central reservation - I can never remember which way round it is!!!), is sitting in the middle lane acceptable?
Well the middle lane lorry is almost twice the length of the lorry on the inside lane if that helps and both lorries were still next to each other when I overtook them and looked in the rearview. The van on the right was going slow so I had to undertake him to get into the outside lane then pass the lorries and then move into the inside lane.
*shakes head*
The white Pug driver had moved into the outside lane just fine, he left enough room to move into the lane so the lorry driver could at least see him moving out into that lane (that's if the lorry driver was paying attention) and I followed shortly after.


What are you on about? the van was doing less than 70 and I was doing just under 70 so naturally was undertaking but LEGALLY, your mistake was assuming I was undertaking illegally at which point all further assumptions fail to make any sense.
The lorry drivers were NOT over taking anything, they were at the same distance apart from the position in the pic to when I was in front of them looking back in the rear view mirror and it's been the same many times before I have seen them do exacly *** same thing hogging the middlelane as they motorway-chat to one another however they do it side by side slowing traffic down behind them.
There are ZERO things wrong with my driving style on the motorway and my daily commute is motorway driving anyway so I am well aware of how certain vehicle drivers tend to use the motorway and there's certainly some things wrong with many lorry driver's driving styles and I fail to see how you can pass judgement on the desires and actions of drivers in a picture when you were not even there and it's also impossible to tell what's going on without background from someone who was![]()
no lane 1 is where everyone should be, lane 2,3,4 etc are for overtaking. you cant stay in a lane just because you are doing 80mph... im sick of the amount of times im stuck behind someone doing 70mph in the 3rd lane because thats "as fast as you should go"


What are you on about? the van was doing less than 70 and I was doing just under 70 so naturally was undertaking but LEGALLY, your mistake was assuming I was undertaking illegally at which point all further assumptions fail to make any sense.
The lorry drivers were NOT over taking anything, they were at the same distance apart from the position in the pic to when I was in front of them looking back in the rear view mirror and it's been the same many times before I have seen them do exacly *** same thing hogging the middlelane as they motorway-chat to one another however they do it side by side slowing traffic down behind them.
There are ZERO things wrong with my driving style on the motorway and my daily commute is motorway driving anyway so I am well aware of how certain vehicle drivers tend to use the motorway and there's certainly some things wrong with many lorry driver's driving styles and I fail to see how you can pass judgement on the desires and actions of drivers in a picture when you were not even there and it's also impossible to tell what's going on without background from someone who was![]()
What are you on about? the van was doing less than 70 and I was doing just under 70 so naturally was undertaking but LEGALLY, your mistake was assuming I was undertaking illegally at which point all further assumptions fail to make any sense.
[TW]Fox;11837741 said:How about you try it and argue it out with the police officer. I'm telling you that you can't![]()

Fox in doesnt know the law again SHOCKER, just like you dont the law regarding invalid insurance and the consequences of driving with invalid insurance,
you dont know the law regarding passing on the left or undertaking
