Soldato
So, so stupid.
dissapointing if true
fuuuAnyone else hearing anything about the aero changes for 2014 being scrapped?
Scarbs has suggested on Twitter that someone on the autosport forums has picked up on it in the latest regs to be published?
Edit...here... http://www.fia.com/news/world-motor-sport-council-2012
So, let me get this straight.
The engine rules that no-one - not the manufacturers, not Bernie, not the circuits, not the fans, not even really the FIA since they didn't particularly want V6s originally, no-one - wanted, they stay. The stuff that virtually everyone wanted - the change in aero regs, the lowering of the tub for safety reasons, etc - that all gets scrapped.
Nice work, FIA. Nice work indeed. You prats.
So, let me get this straight.
The engine rules that no-one - not the manufacturers, not Bernie, not the circuits, not the fans, not even really the FIA since they didn't particularly want V6s originally, no-one - wanted, they stay. The stuff that virtually everyone wanted - the change in aero regs, the lowering of the tub for safety reasons, etc - that all gets scrapped.
Nice work, FIA. Nice work indeed. You prats.
So, let me get this straight.
The engine rules that no-one - not the manufacturers, not Bernie, not the circuits, not the fans, not even really the FIA since they didn't particularly want V6s originally, no-one - wanted, they stay. The stuff that virtually everyone wanted - the change in aero regs, the lowering of the tub for safety reasons, etc - that all gets scrapped.
Nice work, FIA. Nice work indeed. You prats.
What JRS said.
Has there been any reason for the change? I can't really understand why anyone would want to drop the plans other than to allow them to keep their own positions. Are the teams scared of a 2009 style shake up with new regulations?
Seems very much like it was snuck in under the radar to avoid any scruteny.
Reduce costs due to not having to R&D and fabricate new aero solutions?
Only guessing.
It's in the official regs. that have been released, I think it's pretty true
Reduce costs due to not having to R&D and fabricate new aero solutions?
Only guessing.
So instead, we'll see the kind of sums used to fund small nuclear wars spent on the next trick little diffuser that the 2012 aero regs don't specifically prohibit
Would rather that money was spent on KERS and engines.
This, why don't people understand there is no cost reduction, unless the team want it. Stopping avenues does not lower costs, it just shifts available money to other areas, in the last decade that's spending insane amounts are crap aero.
Would rather that money was spent on KERS and engines.