Nice to know but doesn't really mean much as Red Bull were very slow through the speed trap, but were still quickest around a full lap. The two two there were the same as last year generally?
Nice to know but doesn't really mean much as Red Bull were very slow through the speed trap, but were still quickest around a full lap. The two two there were the same as last year generally?
It doesn't mean much, but Red Bull weren't quickest around a lap i.e they didn't set the fastest testing time.
If they were going for a quali run like Williams and Force India, their speed trap reading would have been much higher.
red bull were slow in the speed traps last year to.
MSC Technical DNF's
Monaco - Fire
Hungary Gearbox
aswell as 3 collisions (we can say these are his own fault so discount them even if some arent i cant be bothered to argue about them)
At least provide the full details will you.
Australia - Retired while 20th
Monaco - Retired while 14th
Hungary - Retired while 8th
Singapore - Retired while 9th
Korea - Retired while 12th
So its hardly like Schumacher was robbed of a load of points.
would have finished atleast 8th in hungary.In the middle of the pack, there was a collision between Michael Schumacher and Jaime Alguersuari as a result of which both drivers had to pit for repairs; Schumacher for a puncture and Alguersuari for a front wing. The rest of the field passed through the first lap safely.
alonso finished 6th and was behind schumacher at that point so he would probably have been atleast 7th.Petrov and Alonso had been battling over track position on the straight, but both missed the braking zone, and Petrov rammed into the back of Schumacher,
Who said it was a good idea to introduce turbos?
MSc probably would've done a better job than Webber, but then we are comparing MSc with Rosberg, not Webber.
It is quite possible that Rosberg is a better driver than Webber.
Sparky-F1 said:Nearly ****** myself seeing Bernie suggest Msc should get webbers seat.
The car manufacturers, who want to make the sport more relevant to them.
Like I mentioned in one of previous posts, Rosberg was able to keep out of danger the majority of the time because he was able to qualify pretty well considering the car he had, Michael, on the other hand, did not, apart from Monaco but unfortunately he ballsed up the start and got into trouble that way
so i dont know why its so lol worthy for some people like sparky
Was it not the FIA's idea to make it appeal more to car manufactures and mirror what is happening in the road car market?
cos vettel or webber never make any dubious tactics?why disrupt a team with what would be (most likely) all MSc's demands (including undoubtedly a much higher paypacket than Webber) when you are odds on favourite to collect both championships anyway
They dont need it on the track, they dont need MSc from a marketing perspective either - so its pretty lol worthy to even suggest it.......thats without even looking into whether MSc could drive the car at the front of the grid without resorting to dubious tactics (and any bad press that results)
realisticly its not likely to happen and i would say it was laughable