My comment of Playstation may seem a trolling one, but the original version of Playstation never made it forward so I guess it suits your requirements.
Plus it's one to make you look uber geeky to your friends who might not know the origins of Playstation.
totally understand where you are coming from - but I still disagree, only because its a brandname from one company coupled with a product from another
ie an inhouse project is always going to get much more support than something from a 3rd party you yourself are going to market
Plus it wasnt really a console in its own right - it was really just an updated package (not unlike a spectrum & spectrum +2) , cant even really compare it to something like the repackaging of PS2's /PS3's and Xboxs etc simply because the latter dont really change their ability as such
Just my call on the subject

I'm the proud owner of a 60-movie strong collection of Laserdiscs, along with a Pioneer player (I can't remember the model number, but it reads both sides of the disc). Not that it was a failed format, it was hugely successful in parts of Asia, but it was constantly overshadowed by VHS in the West.
Something like the LD 2950? I believe it was something like that which could play both sides
A bit like MS, Sony has changed the depts involved in the entertainment division and now include the R&D costs. This has happened since the PS3 so all numbers previous didnt include R&D cost so they look far better and the PS3 looks far worse. It still doesnt hide the fact that the PS3 has been a money pit for SCE, i guess we wont know how much of the BD "win" over HDDVD has increased sales of BD disks and Sony royalties to help offset this. Now the PS3 is making a profit at its less than halfway point I wonder how long (if at all) it will take SCE to make the money they lost back.
As far as I understand it (and the company I work for studies these figures for investment purposes - and with a £15bn fund, are pretty good at it) - Sony are in over all profit from the PS3 including R&D, and not requiring the gargantuan profits from the PS and PS2 to "cook" the books
While originally the PS3 was costing Sony a handful with each sold unit, they are now making a profit on each one (and I believe have been for about 6 months or more)
No way in the world can anyone classify the PSP as a failure - incl R&D it has easily earnt more than it cost to develope and market, UMD is/was a huge disaster and PSPgo was a drastic mistake but PSP in generall was alright (although I would agree that it was a let down ) certainly no disaster/failure
Last edited: