Also, people having a pop at tang0 for posting this story yet none having a pop at the actor who it is now being accused of faking a race-hate crime to trigger more anti-Trump hate.
I thought CNN was fake news...
so you found 'reporting' crap news as crap news on here the best thing to do? surely, not perpetuating crap is the better way forward and just ignoring idiocy is the best? Ah the internet, bringing idiocy to the masses no matter what the medium!
I suspected this story had more going than meets the eye when the first reports started to break as the events as told just didn't seem to make much sense and it now looks likely that it has been faked for an unknown reason. With the history of racial tension that Chicago has it'll be interesting to see, if Smollet is charged for a fake race-hate report, just what the Police will charge him for, because would making a false claim about 2 white people attacking a black man be considered a race-hate crime in itself?
Also, people having a pop at tang0 for posting this story yet none having a pop at the actor who it is now being accused of faking a race-hate crime to trigger more anti-Trump hate. I keep talking about the anti-Trump echo chamber this forum has in the Trump thread in SC, where looking at an event in a single specific way can leave you blind to the truth when it disagrees with your views, but it's a shame to see people post multiple times here yet ignoring a fairly important race-hate story, especially as it now is starting to look likely that it was all fake. You would think that after having a known fake event like the initial Covington reporting, where the anti-MAGA reaction is more important that the actual truth, happen so recently that people might be a little more cautious with instantly believing a story just because it fits your own narrative, regardless of how true it is or not. It's a shame really.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-47269827
Was actually coming in here to say the police had released a statement saying the allegations were false, but they've since confirmed the story.
Agreed, it’s utterly disgusting.Agreed. It is frankly bizarre that some people's response to a potential false flag attack is to attack the people the false flagger attempted to smear.
Agreed. It is frankly bizarre that some people's response to a potential false flag attack is to attack the people the false flagger attempted to smear.
The (fake news) media have been doing it ever since Trump's election, they're the ones pushing divisive propaganda and yet they project it all onto Trump. Why would Trump want Americans divided? ideally he wants everyone united behind him. The left have to keep their docile SJW sheep onside with them by pushing Russia conspiracies and other far right BS or Trump will win easily in 2020.
Even before the 2016 elections the Clinton campaign has been exposed by Project Veritas as sending people to Trump rallies to incite violence, it's all optics for their media backers.
BS
The vast majority of responses I've seen is people condemning him and calling for prosecution (and rightly so)
I believe in the truth, there are positives in both right and left, but it’s obvious what the OP is doing. He has no interest in the story, he just like to bash the left.
You're calling the OP saying that he's said the source was fake news etc. But from YOUR perspective cnn isn't fake news.. so you should believe it, right?
As for the story itself (which @Raymond Lin fails to actually comment on), I'm not surprised by stories like this. There are literally thousands of people who do similar things to attention seek playing the victim. This sort of thing should be condemned by all moral people, whether left or right, as it makes a mockery of hate crime.
I mean one minute he calls them fake news yet he reads their site and uses them as source?!
Strangely it seems there's a greater (if not universal) tendency for thoose on the contemporary 'right' to look at and even seek out views from people and outlets that they don't think will be in accordance to their current views.
Unlike the contemporary 'left' which have a greater (but not universal) tendency either to demand and/ or inhabit a 'safe space' or to actively seek to no platform and /or shout down any sources of information that may not be in accordance with their existing world view.
I like to look at a wide range of sources as at least a partial antidote to confirmation bias.
Its rather sad that you apparently (?) don't think that exposing yourself to a conflicting view might just be healthy every now an then.
If it’s merely different views then why label it fake?
CNN despite their protestations of being a 'real' news outlet have all too often been found out 'editorialising' their output and are arguably one of the most egregious offenders of the large players.
The are far from alone and this is not a position unique to the contemporary 'left'...
But I think there is for example a far greater wilingness in the 'right' to criticise Trump when he is perceived to be acting incorrectly but conversely an overwhelming williness of 'left' outlets to jump on any old story they can think can be spun against him whilst glossing over any failures closer to home.