• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Fallout 4 to feature Nvidia Gameworks

So why didn't you work with developers before release to get a sli profile sorted on your own sponsored game you ****wit.......that would be my response if I had Nvidia. Just lazy, but Nvidia are perfect right lol.
 
TonyTurbo78 said:
So why didn't you work with developers before release to get a sli profile sorted on your own sponsored game you ****wit.......that would be my response if I had Nvidia. Just lazy, but Nvidia are perfect right lol.
Click to expand...

Because more Nvidia users will benefit from Gameworks then those few people who use SLI. In the words of Spock "The needs of the many out weight the needs of the few".
 
Klunt Bumskrint said:
I don't understand why SLI isn't pushed to the nth degree. It gives them more units in homes, more income, more industry attention.
Click to expand...

Agreed. As Nvidia sponsored the game, it would have made sense to have good SLI support from the off. Mind you, as a proper chuckle moment, I remember Alien Isolation getting released and SLI worked a treat from the off but no Crossfire and that was an AMD sponsored game :D
 
Freddie1980 said:
Looks like AMD has a bit of work to do with getting FO4 optimaised, teh 980Ti is over a third quicker.
Click to expand...

On the other hand look at the massive fps drops when changing resolutions on nvidia cards (looking at 980ti and fury x)
980ti goes from 125>84>41
Fury x goes from 90>61>33

Now if AMD comes up with drivers which brings fury x close to 980ti at 1080p, it will most likely jump in front on higher resolutions.
 
Freddie1980 said:
Looks like AMD has a bit of work to do with getting FO4 optimaised, teh 980Ti is over a third quicker.
Click to expand...

Yup.. also when a GTX 770 is matching a 290X/390X something is not right.:rolleyes: Good old Nvidia up to it's old tricks again.

It's becoming a very nasty business is the GPU market and the silliness both companies are playing with game developers for their sponsored titles.. :mad:

Also we need them both in the market or it really will be a pitiful experience for the customers. Just wish a third company would enter the market and stirs things up again on the CPU and GPU front. AMD vs Intel and AMD vs Nvidia ..

If AMD goes belly up we are all in for a horrible PC experience. (Sadly starting to see why so many people are on consoles or moving to consoles, I've never ever owned a console only a Sony PSP as I liked handheld gaming back then).
 
Purgatory said:
The benchmarks are all over the place with this and the guru3d benchmarks.. Who do you believe ? ....


http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/fallout-4-pc-graphics-performance-benchmark-review,1.html


These sites have all got their own agendas recently too it seems...
Click to expand...

I tend to believe GameGPU more. Friend has an R9 290 with an FX8320 and is running the game at 1920X1080 fine. Also look at the framerates GameGPU are getting - they are testing a more intense area than GameGPU it appears.

But the engine is performing OK on AMD CPUs,which is a big deal, since Skyrim was only really using two threads at most.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom