Farage has bank accounts closed

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm actually finding your attitude to this terrifying.

For a second here, who gives a **** who Farage is, and what he could possibly have done, mingled with, blah blah brexit, pint, plane, boat watching etc.. If there is a CHANCE that the bank is refusing to give him a reason, when requested, as to why the account is being closed - that just in itself is a big, big, problem as we hurtle towards a cashless future.

Now if he has done something wrong, the bank have told him why, but he's just throwing his toys out the pram like he usually does because he doesn't like that he's been caught out, then yea, fair play have at him.

Problem is here, we don't know. That's what I find worrying.
You can’t tell him, you could be guilty of “tipping off” check out the penalties for that.
 
From the FOS -

Notice periods for personal bank accounts

If you intend to close a personal bank account, you should usually give your customer reasonable notice so they can make alternative arrangements. We’d usually expect you to give them at least 30 days’ notice.

We’d only expect you to give a customer less than 30 days’ notice in exceptional circumstances. This might be where:

  • you suspect them of fraud
  • they were threatening or abusive to your staff
We’ll check whether the terms of the customer’s account specify a notice period and what the terms say about the circumstances in which you can close an account. If an account’s notice period is less than 30 days, we’d still usually expect you to have allowed the customer at least 30 days’ notice before closing the account.

So unless they have been abusive, there is only one other option.
 
Do we though? FCA regulated ones?

Do try and actually read the thread so you are less likely to beclown yourself....

Tide: We are regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)

Dissent is becoming increasingly difficult in the digital realm. Governments and social-media platforms are getting more ban-happy. Perhaps worst of all, you can now be excluded from online payment systems and banking apps simply for airing the wrong views.
Konstantin Kisin and Francis Foster, co-hosts of the popular Triggernometry podcast, have become the latest victims of this financial deplatforming. Last week, they were told by fintech company Tide that Triggernometry’s bank account was to be shut down. No explanation was given, but we can probably guess why.


Cancelling accounts of people who aren’t on a list of fraudsters, terrorists or money launderers? To be fair they wouldn’t be able to open an account in the first place these days. In these situations there is always the offshore UK market of course.

Fraudsters, terrorists and money launders can be told that this is the reason for accounts being closed.

Again the issue is when it happens to someone who doesn't know why and the institutions stonewall them and often act in concert with one another
 
You can’t tell him, you could be guilty of “tipping off” check out the penalties for that.

Which sounds reasonable, if it beyond all reasonable doubt, and doubly verified. Who decides? What scrutiny is it put under?

Can you not see how this could be weaponised? It's conspiracy theory stuff, but one that falls within the realms of believability and possibility.
 
Turns out he’s not actually being denied a U.K. personal bank account at all - it’s a business account he’s being denied.

“Later on Thursday night, on GB News, Mr Farage said the bank had called him up and offered him a personal account within the banking group division, but not a business account. He said he was considering whether “life was worth living” in the UK.”

Farage himself reckons he’s seen as a risk as he is a Politically Exposed Person (which he says is an EU concept that he wants changed.)

“I think the reason for it was, you know, where people in politics are open to bribery.”

“Could foreign governments from Ukraine or China or wherever else it may be, could they be pumping money into, you know, the accounts of corrupt politicians.

“So I kind of understand that and get that but it’s all about interpretation, isn’t it? And what the banks argue is that to maintain an account for a politically exposed person, gives them increased costs of compliance.”

(In passing interesting that he gives Ukraine as the example of a foreign country that might be bribing corrupt politicians in the U.K. rather than - say - Russia. Why ever could that be?)


inews.co.uk

What we know about Nigel Farage's claim he has been shut out of his bank accounts

In a six-minute video on Twitter, Mr Farage says he can no longer get a bank account. How true could his claims be?
inews.co.uk
inews.co.uk
 
Which sounds reasonable, if it beyond all reasonable doubt, and doubly verified. Who decides? What scrutiny is it put under?

Can you not see how this could be weaponised? It's conspiracy theory stuff, but one that falls within the realms of believability and possibility.

I’d love to help here but the annual training tells you how to do this. You have an MLRO and a Compliance officer you report it to. I know these people, they aren’t politically motivated monsters (unlike Farage).
 
Turns out he’s not actually being denied a U.K. personal bank account at all - it’s a business account he’s being denied.

“Later on Thursday night, on GB News, Mr Farage said the bank had called him up and offered him a personal account within the banking group division, but not a business account. He said he was considering whether “life was worth living” in the UK.”

Farage himself reckons he’s seen as a risk as he is a Politically Exposed Person (which he says is an EU concept that he wants changed.)

“I think the reason for it was, you know, where people in politics are open to bribery.”

“Could foreign governments from Ukraine or China or wherever else it may be, could they be pumping money into, you know, the accounts of corrupt politicians.

“So I kind of understand that and get that but it’s all about interpretation, isn’t it? And what the banks argue is that to maintain an account for a politically exposed person, gives them increased costs of compliance.”

(In passing interesting that he gives Ukraine as the example of a foreign country that might be bribing corrupt politicians in the U.K. rather than - say - Russia. Why ever could that be?)


inews.co.uk

What we know about Nigel Farage's claim he has been shut out of his bank accounts

In a six-minute video on Twitter, Mr Farage says he can no longer get a bank account. How true could his claims be?
inews.co.uk
inews.co.uk

Aha, a “politically exposed person”. Just like the training said. Plus I knew he was being a wuss about it.
 
Which sounds reasonable, if it beyond all reasonable doubt, and doubly verified. Who decides? What scrutiny is it put under?

Can you not see how this could be weaponised? It's conspiracy theory stuff, but one that falls within the realms of believability and possibility.

The legal threshold is suspicion.
 
No they can’t, see “tipping off”

Caracus2K:*facepalm*

Are you being disengenious or are you just trolling?

I'm clearly questioning what should be 'mandated by law' and what should and should not be acceptable for companies to do when it comes to refusing/ withdrawing services and what information they must provide if they do decide to refuse to provide or continue a service.
 
Enemies list updated:
EU
Muslims
BBC
Joe Biden
Hunter Biden
Foreigners
ECHR
UK Judges
Privileges Committees
Remainers
Lefty Lawyers
Gary Lineker
Gary Neville
Gary Sparrow
When Gary Met Sally
Sue Gray
The French
Carol Vorderman
Civil Servants
Meghan Markle
Supermarkets
Pride Flags
Trees
Banks
You forgot MSM and Soros

And electric cars, but not Teslas
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom