Fascinating new theory for Nazca Lines

arknor · 15 May 2020 at 15:08

seth1969 said:
It's not improbable. They sure love to move giant stones around instead of, you know, breaking them down to make it easier. Some pre-civilisation architectures look pretty crazy.

I think they did this because it was easy for them, how ever they did it...[/QUOTE]
maybe its easy to transport mass in large chunks when you're using manpower, ropes, wooden rollers etc

like moving a 100 ton block probably takes less time than moving 10 x 10ton blocks

seth1969 · 15 May 2020 at 17:15

arknor said:
I think they did this because it was easy for them, how ever they did it...

maybe its easy to transport mass in large chunks when you're using manpower, ropes, wooden rollers etc

like moving a 100 ton block probably takes less time than moving 10 x 10ton blocks[/QUOTE]

The ones from baalbek are 1500 tonne, we can not move that weight now with all our machines.
That's why i find it fascinating

arknor · 15 May 2020 at 17:26

seth1969 said:
The ones from baalbek are 1500 tonne, we can not move that weight now with all our machines.
That's why i find it fascinating

Taisun (Chinese: 泰山; pinyin: tàishān; Taishan) is the name of the world's strongest crane which has a safe working load of 20,000 metric tons (22,046 short tons).[1] Taisun is designed and built for the installation of very large modules in semi submersibles and FPSO projects and located at Yantai Raffles Shipyard in Yantai, Shandong Province, China. The crane holds the three heaviest lifts of all time: 20,133 metric tons, 17,100 tons and 14,000 tons.

BTW also nasa

Maximum speed for the transporter was about one mile per hour when loaded. An unfueled Saturn V and mobile launch platform weighed 6,000 tons; the Crawler Transporter by itself weighed 3,000 tons! Launch Pads 39A and B were three and a half miles from the VAB.

seth1969 · 15 May 2020 at 18:07

Quartz said:
The rock formation yes; the carved creation, no. It was carved by the Egyptians. It had a pharonic beard and it has an Egyptian headdress.

It was all craved from bed rock, as it has a perimeter all around it showing weathering from the last time egypt saw a lot of water.

SexyGreyFox · 15 May 2020 at 18:35

seth1969 said:
The sphinx was there long before the Egyptians

Not really, they were still Egyptians but a bit older.
Because of water weathering it could have been built around 10,000BC before the Giza pyramids.
10,000 years ago it even faced the constellation that is associated with the lion - apparently if you listen to Hancock & Bauval.

Boge · 15 May 2020 at 18:43

seth1969 said:
The ones from baalbek are 1500 tonne, we can not move that weight now with all our machines.
That's why i find it fascinating

And you can't get get a Rizla between the joints on them.

Blows your mind up close.

seth1969 · 15 May 2020 at 21:40

SexyGreyFox said:
Not really, they were still Egyptians but a bit older.
Because of water weathering it could have been built around 10,000BC before the Giza pyramids.
10,000 years ago it even faced the constellation that is associated with the lion - apparently if you listen to Hancock & Bauval.

The bed rock was level, they the people dug down like a foot ball pitch and 20 ft down left a lump in the middle called a Loin....

seth1969 · 15 May 2020 at 21:43

They did IT because it was easy for them, this tech is long gone.
They did a good job as we still do not know for sure

seth1969 · 15 May 2020 at 21:44

arknor said:
BTW also nasa

in 4000 BC?.......

seth1969 · 15 May 2020 at 21:56

This man well there ya go Zahi Hawass the robbing b"£$$%$ (Director Of Egyptian Antiquities) ok

gEd · 15 May 2020 at 22:52

Boge said:
And you can't get get a Rizla between the joints on them.

Blows your mind up close.

I just go and google for Rizla and joints for more information on this topic....

Angilion · 15 May 2020 at 22:57

seth1969 said:
in 4000 BC?.......

You stated:

seth1969 said:
[..] The ones from baalbek are 1500 tonne, we can not move that weight now with all our machines.

So someone replied with a couple of examples of machines now that can move far more weight. Including a machine that can lift 8 times that weight. Not just move it, lift it.

You didn't say that we can't take existing machines backwards in time 6000 years. You said that such machines don't exist today. They do.

In 4000 BC they had more time and more labour for massive construction projects. Half a million person-years of work can get an awful lot done. The stone at Baalbeck are in a different league, though. 50 tonne blocks, sure. Put them on a sledge, drag them. But 1500 tonnes? I don't know if that's possible.

seth1969 · 15 May 2020 at 23:06

seth1969 · 15 May 2020 at 23:21

Angilion said:
You stated:

So someone replied with a couple of examples of machines now that can move far more weight. Including a machine that can lift 8 times that weight. Not just move it, lift it.

You didn't say that we can't take existing machines backwards in time 6000 years. You said that such machines don't exist today. They do.

In 4000 BC they had more time and more labour for massive construction projects. Half a million person-years of work can get an awful lot done. The stone at Baalbeck are in a different league, though. 50 tonne blocks, sure. Put them on a sledge, drag them. But 1500 tonnes? I don't know if that's possible.[/QUOTE

build a a crane on a water course bring the thing on barges wow]

seth1969 · 15 May 2020 at 23:34

Any one that has a prob with any of this Göbekli Tepe, well we just did this before any metal tools, then it just got buried on a hill top for no reason yeh
burned

seth1969 · 15 May 2020 at 23:42

Wake the fu"£$$" up https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGtDAHRK8s0

Watch this and tell me different

seth1969 · 16 May 2020 at 00:00

The best stone companys in the world was asked if they could make these, they said they could, but not out of one piece like these.....]

LizardKing · 16 May 2020 at 01:43

seth1969 said:
Wake the fu"£$$" up https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGtDAHRK8s0

Watch this and tell me different

I had to stop that within the first few moments, the amount of projecting going on is to much.

just to address those first few moments, we dont make that stuff because we dont need to, not because we cant. im pretty sure the romans were more than capable of creating such monoliths had they seen the need. without the need there is no desire or the drive, its not a lack of capability's. The Egypitians were good at what they did, they saw high value in these things, later generations less so and as such the specific knowledge investment needed was not worth while to maintain.

Malevolence · 16 May 2020 at 06:54

LizardKing said:
im pretty sure the romans were more than capable of creating such monoliths had they seen the need.

Yeah, you just have to look at the Pantheon in Rome to see what the Romans were capable of, ignore the masterpiece that is dome for moment and look at the Corinthian columns. Those are something like 75 tons each and were quarried and sculpted some 100 miles inland from the Nile, then dragged to the Nile and transported all the way to Rome for erection. Best thing is, once they got there and erected they were found to be 10' too short, hence the outline above the current portico showing where the original design said the portico should have been. Wonder if the Roman Empire had an equivalent of Checkatrade.com?

=XDC=FluphyBunny · 16 May 2020 at 08:23

seth1969 said:
Wake the fu"£$$" up https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGtDAHRK8s0

Watch this and tell me different

Making things up and filming it does not make true. Nonsense like that is just embarrassing to watch.