Fascinating new theory for Nazca Lines

Great-Pyramid-at-the-center-of-our-planet.jpg
 
@seth1969
You are sounding like me in the early 70s when I took absolutely everything in I read in my latest paperback I'd bought.
Like you I am fascinated by Ancient architecture and been to every major Egyptian site three times but you realise when you are there that these fantastic structures are made with man power and a huge belief in their Gods.
Yes the lining up of the Great Pyramid is aligned to Sirius and Osiris from the Kings Chamber and the Giza site is aligned with Orion's Belt but when they spent so much time looking up at the sky at their Gods it makes sense that they wanted to bring Heaven to Earth and they would do anything to achieve it.
 
SexyGreyFox said:
@seth1969
You are sounding like me in the early 70s when I took absolutely everything in I read in my latest paperback I'd bought.
Like you I am fascinated by Ancient architecture and been to every major Egyptian site three times but you realise when you are there that these fantastic structures are made with man power and a huge belief in their Gods.
Yes the lining up of the Great Pyramid is aligned to Sirius and Osiris from the Kings Chamber and the Giza site is aligned with Orion's Belt but when they spent so much time looking up at the sky at their Gods it makes sense that they wanted to bring Heaven to Earth and they would do anything to achieve it.
Click to expand...

More to do with being in the building trade for last 35 years, learning how hard it is to move large weights. I find it fascinating.
 
seth1969 said:
[..] Yeh to be sure that will be there in five thousand years from now :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

You've been faced with irrefutable evidence that your statement is ludicrously wrong, so now you're moving the goalposts to a different claim that humans today couldn't build anything that would be a solid ruin in 5000 years. Of course we could - we'd just have to place lots of blocks of stone on top of each other. Like the Egyptians did with the pyramids. It would be trivially easy to do so with modern technology.

The pyramid shape is equally obvious because it's the most stable shape when you're piling blocks on top of each other to get as high as possible and you have only very limited technology. That's why, for example, some earlier pyramids collapsed because the angle of the slope wasn't what it needs to be and why one surviving pyramid is built with slopes at two different angles.

Given that one of your claims is that the pyramids are on the intersection of the longest line of latitude (which is the equator, which the pyramids are not on) and the longest line of longitude (which doesn't exist - they're all the same length), I'm wondering if it's worth taking a look at your other mystical maths claims.
 
seth1969 said:
The longest line of land mass, both ways............
Click to expand...

Still no. THat's in Asia, somewhere north of India, probably in Kazakhstan, going from the tip of India to somewhere in the vicinity of Leskino, Russia and from somewhere near Brest to somewhere on the east coast of China.

It's not even the longest latitudinal line in Africa. That's from Somalia to West Africa.
 
Never underestimate the value of patience. And it's easy to achieve 2D symmetry with just chalk and string. Add a measuring stick for 3D symmetry.

There were no super-advanced civilisations. The archeological and geological records are clear.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom