Fat...?

Ahh so this thread has gone the way of most others on the subject. Who'd have though that what with the demographic of this forum being mostly computer geeks or 12 years olds. Both with only experience of a woman in a poster on the bedroom wall! :D

It's "lol fatty" Amirite, lads? Well...
 
I wouldn't say the picture in the OP's post is fat, but she is certainly on the heavy side of curvy. I wouldn't want her to get much if any bigger. ;) Regardless, I still find that image more attractive than nearly all of the thin looking model pics we get bombarded with in the media and press.
 
LordSplodge said:
Ahh so this thread has gone the way of most others on the subject. Who'd have though that what with the demographic of this forum being mostly computer geeks or 12 years olds. Both with only experience of a woman in a poster on the bedroom wall! :D

It's "lol fatty" Amirite, lads? Well...
Click to expand...

Have you ever looked in the "post a pic of your gf" thread? A surprising chunk of us "geeks" have bagged hotties. :p
 
The goal is to snag them when they are overweight, then when they slim down you end up getting a hotty :p

tumblrly94t3phvh1qig43x.png


Better picture

DLDU7.jpg
 
Last edited:
arc@css said:
I wouldn't say the picture in the OP's post is fat, but she is certainly on the heavy side of curvy. I wouldn't want her to get much if any bigger. ;) Regardless, I still find that image more attractive than nearly all of the thin looking model pics we get bombarded with in the media and press.
Click to expand...

When did curvy start to mean fat though, I though it meant having curves, which a woman can have under a size 12. Boobs and booty = curvy, not rolls of fat, there is nothing curvy about a blob.
 
Broken Hope said:
The goal is to snag them when they are overweight, then when they slim down you end up getting a hotty :p

http://img830.imageshack.us/img830/5296/tumblrly94t3phvh1qig43x.png[/IMG

[/Quote]

In the first set of pictures the clothes on some make her look better than others, for example 165 looks better than 140.

As for the second picture whilst obviously she's lost a lot of weight (and good for her) it uses the classic bad light, badly shot grumpy looking picture versus well shot, happy looking picture that most diet adverts use.
Click to expand...
 
A the turn of the millenium the average UK size was 14, probably more by now. It's an accurate representation, but not a good one.
 
The woman in the OP is fat, not only that, every single other woman in the competition was better looking by miles as well.
 
The woman in the OP is definitely fat, a long shot from "curvy", however, if people like that, then fair enough, leave the rest of the non-fat women to the rest of us :).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom