FHM

Man of Honour
Joined
24 Sep 2005
Posts
37,341
I remember buying FHM many moons ago and enjoying it very much so. In a conversation with friends (girls mainly) they were very vocal about their dislike of FHM, saying its a 'cheap and nasty' magazine. Even then, my male friends seemed to think it was a waste of space as well, making it out to be full of dross ala 'nuts' / 'zoo'. I argued rather fiercely back that it was actually a very good magazine, filled with light hearted humour, gadgets, silly stories, fashion and ladies, all in digestable amounts. To confirm this, I went out and bought it this month.

What can I say - what a great fun read. Obviously not a novel (so it shouldn't be treated as such), its an entertaining an all encompassing magazine which I feel has a huge unfair stigma against it. All things of interest to men are covered, but not in a sleazy cheap way. The fashion section is brief but decent, features are broad (for example, the pull out feature this month was on how to save money). The interviews were great, such as a new series on 'straight to dvd heros' where one of them goes toe to toe with Ivan Drago from Rocky IV (!!!).

The articals were interesting (Such as the one on animal cruelty), the humour was generally tasteful and easy to read (such as the one on pirates, or things with 'design flaws' such as plastic spatulas or terminator 2). Lasty, the girl pages (one or two interviews with a model over several pages) make for good eyecandy witout being overly distasteful.

I will certainly be buying it frequently now having been very impressed with this issue. Its unfairly placed with other magazines such as 'zoo' and I find it highly hypocritical that females slate it when they will sit there reading 'Cosmopoliton', the worlds most sex crazed non pornographic magazine.

So what do you lot think of it? Is it a good read? Do you dislike it? Are there other similar magazines which you think are better?

(On a side note (semi-unrelated), anything from 'Paragon Publishing' is guaranteed to be a great read, eg Total Film or Total Guitar since they never read pompously and weve humour and the subject matter very well. I would recommend either of those above to anyone.)
 
I'm going back to FHM after having a subscription to Maxim. Only cost me £10 for 2 years, but there's times when it would just take me 30 minutes to leaf through an issue and have read all I could find I wanted to read. FHM was always worth for picking up multiple times.
 
I'd much rather read the mags off the very top shelf. FHM are just for boys or those "testing the water" with their gfs to see what they can and can't get away with at home.

:p
 
I'd much rather read the mags off the very top shelf. FHM are just for boys or those "testing the water" with their gfs to see what they can and can't get away with at home.

:p
Thats exactly the rubbish I was talking about. Its just so unfair to lable FHM like that when its so much more. I realise I may have missed the sarcasm if any :D

I didn't find the adverts too bad.
 
FHM, Zoo, Nuts et al are are mindless drivel.

If I want to see **** I'll use the Internet. If I feel the need to read crapy articles I'll buy a copy of the Sun for 20p
 
usually only buy FHM if im getting a train somewhere and theres a newsagents near by but every time i have i read through almost all of it and thought it was a good mag
 
very good magazine, filled with light hearted humour, gadgets, silly stories, fashion and ladies, all in digestable amounts.

Nuts&Zoo were also full of the exact same content?? Forgive me if they have changed but about 2 1/2 - 1 year ago i used to get it sometimes from the shop to read through on the train and it amused me, It was always pretty much the smaller weekly version of FHM but a bit cheaper(in feel etc, obviously it was a fair bit cheaper since it was weekly)

Cant remember which i prefered out of zoo+nuts, think it was nuts and one time i bought zoo and thought it was PAP!
 
But then I don't like Hollyoaks, indie music, football or cars either. :)
Nor do I. There was a section on 'football in the future' and a page on classic cars, which are both unread as yet.

LordSplodge said:
FHM, Zoo, Nuts et al are are mindless drivel.
I get the impression you have never read it then.

Its currently the most read magazine in the house (of 3 girls and 2 boys). The girls have since given their approval.

Nuts&Zoo were also full of the exact same content??
Zoo and Nuts are aimed at the 'lager lad culture', whilst FHM is not. For the record, Nuts and Zoo are fairly vile.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom