Masi didn't just fudge the last race, he fudged loads of decisions that went in Max's favour.
Most of these decisions weren't Masi's to make; they were made by the Stewards.
Masi didn't just fudge the last race, he fudged loads of decisions that went in Max's favour.
It doesn't matter, the agreement was in place and clearly Masi only attempted to keep to that. I think it was a wonderful end to the season as Max deservedly, as it would have been if Lewis had, won the WC.Do you think any of the teams would have agreed to a scenario where only some of the cars get to unlap themselves for the sole benefit of only one driver to challenge for a position/the win?
Absolutely ****** not is the answer...
It's obviously an absurd rule because it means some competitors get a whole laps advantage against who they were racing against! It cannot be emphasised enough, just how stupid what Masi did was.
.
Of course there would, have you seen some of the really horrible, nastiness that's come out of the Max fans this year? If anything, I think it would be worse, they seem to model themselves on the Verstappen family and we all know what Jos is like.One wonders, if it had been the other way around, would there be the the amount of rubbish and wrongful and outrageous attacks upon this man as there is now.
I very much doubt it and I feel for Masi...
It doesn't matter, ,
Yeah see that's my problem. As a poster said above there was so much else wrong with the season. As far as I'm concerned Max's driving was atrocious and he should have been penalised much harsher for at least 3-4 incidents. Even the fact Hamilton got penalised for Silverstone was a joke, Max turned right into him after Lewis was ahead and had the corner.
I'll fully admit I'm blinded by my dislike of Max but I think he's an arrogant, dangerous driver and the officials last year let him get away with murder. Therefore I can't see how he could deserve the title. Masi didn't just fudge the last race, he fudged loads of decisions that went in Max's favour.
IMO probably doing what Toto said and discounting the last lap (or whatever it was) would be fairer.
It doesn't matter, the agreement was in place and clearly Masi only attempted to keep to that. I think it was a wonderful end to the season as Max deservedly, as it would have been if Lewis had, won the WC.
What is badly wrong though is the amount of vitiol withIn this forum and elsewhere towards the poor man, who was only doing the job the FIA set him up to do and had done a good one throughout his time as race director. He was the only individual, who when selected, had the credentials and experience to replace Charlie.
One wonders, if it had been the other way around, would there be the the amount of rubbish and wrongful and outrageous attacks upon this man as there is now.
I very much doubt it and I feel for Masi...
What a load of complete ********
You really honestly think, that if Masi had radioed through to all teams to say.
"ok you all want the race to finish under green, the way i will do that is to only let a few cars through, so only 1st and 2nd will be clear to race properly, everyone after will not be able to compete fairly for your positions, with a possibility of getting to the podium, as the rest of the lapped cars will be in the way of any fair competition for positions and points.
Are you all happy with that? "
None of the teams except Red Bull would be happy with that.
THE ONLY reason the teams asked that races finish under green, is SO ALL TEAMS get to race fairly and properly, for positions and points.
No one wanted an unfair, uncompetitive, rigged finish.
It doesn't matter, the agreement was in place and clearly Masi only attempted to keep to that. I think it was a wonderful end to the season as Max deservedly, as it would have been if Lewis had, won the WC.
What is badly wrong though is the amount of vitiol withIn this forum and elsewhere towards the poor man, who was only doing the job the FIA set him up to do and had done a good one throughout his time as race director. He was the only individual, who when selected, had the credentials and experience to replace Charlie.
One wonders, if it had been the other way around, would there be the the amount of rubbish and wrongful and outrageous attacks upon this man as there is now.
I very much doubt it and I feel for Masi...
It was you! You jinxed itHaving only watched one race last season, and it being a massive farce, I had not planned on watching any more.
You mean the fans that support an entitled, arrogant, violent young man that bases his outlook on his father's doing? His father who was previously given a 5 year suspended jail sentence for assault, who was charged and given a suspended sentence for assaulting his wife, and finally in 2011 the man who was arrested for attempted murder on his then-girlfriend. Yeah, Max fans would be absolutely fineOne wonders, if it had been the other way around, would there be the the amount of rubbish and wrongful and outrageous attacks upon this man as there is now.
I very much doubt it and I feel for Masi...
I wonder what would have happened if they hadn't been allowed to unlap.
Glad Masi's gone, however I have some concerns over the new race directors.
Firstly, Niels Wittich was in charge of the absolute **** show at the last round of DTM, so that really doesn't bode too well. Secondly, having two separate race directors is just asking for inconsistency between races.
Freitas I do rate highly, though. His stewardship of the WEC has been excellent for many years.
Max would have got past them pretty quickly and would have set off after Lewis with about half a lap to go. I don't know whether he'd have got past or not but either way, I'd have been satisfied with the result because it would have been consistent with the rules.
If the rules had been applied correctly, 0 cars would have overtaken Lewis because it would have finished under the safety car.I'm not sure it would have been, but it wouldn't have been completely ad-libbing some rules for the lols in such an unbalanced and unfair way. I'd have been okay with it, I think.