• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Fidelity Super Resolution in 2021

Dlss 1.0 = shoulda gone to specsavers
fsr = has been to specsavers
dlss latest = has had laser eye surgery tho still sees ghosting/cataracts


FSR is more like has gone to a high end optometrist cause you have to run high resolution to get a good image which means you're a baller because you have a 1k graphics card already
 
A fan mod has added FSR support for Grand Theft Auto 5

This mod replaces the original GTA5 upscaler when using Frame scale mode in Advanced Graphics Settings lower than display resolution with FSR. The point is to see if FSR produces a better image output at 2560x1440 than the built in GTA5 one.

ScreenshotComparison:
https://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/15394/

i dont see a change in fps when fsr is on. i thought it would jump by 25% more fps with fsr on. so no benefit.
 
FSR is more like has gone to a high end optometrist cause you have to run high resolution to get a good image which means you're a baller because you have a 1k graphics card already

Do not act like DLSS is perfect at lower resolution either.
Both of these techs perform better when the fixed resolution is already higher.
 
i dont see a change in fps when fsr is on. i thought it would jump by 25% more fps with fsr on. so no benefit.

There's no change in fps because the base resolution is the same, the video is testing quality improvements over built-in upscaling and not over native.

Because its not FSR ignore these videos. The guy just enabled Sharpening.

Nonsense. Look at the github.
 
Do not act like DLSS is perfect at lower resolution either.
Both of these techs perform better when the fixed resolution is already higher.

Thats not true. DLSS in control, you can set the internal resolution to 540p and get a better than native looking 1080p.


10:35 - looks shocking like the native image. 540p @ 1080p vs 1080p. DLSS 2.0 reconstructs the sub pixel detail of the hair better than the native image.
 
Thats not true. DLSS in control, you can set the internal resolution to 540p and get a better than native looking 1080p.


10:35 - looks shocking like the native image. 540p @ 1080p vs 1080p. DLSS 2.0 reconstructs the sub pixel detail of the hair better than the native image.

Yeah thats a big and immediately noticeable difference between dlss and FSR and hence why dlss is better with fewer pixels - dlss can add back pixel detail that doesn't exist with it off, dlss is able to get you detail that you couldn't see before, where as fsr only takes away detail - you can set the level of detail removed but it never adds anything back
 
Well, for now maybe, in future u never know what the future holds for fsr 1.1 or 1.2 etc.

We know quite well what AMD are doing with FSR. They are basically creating DLSS 1 in a way. They have a patent for a hybrid of the current normal methods of upscalin and an AI network. Intel are rumored to be creating their own DLSS called XeSS. MS has stated that they are creating an AI upscaling method for DirectML.
 
Yeah thats a big and immediately noticeable difference between dlss and FSR and hence why dlss is better with fewer pixels - dlss can add back pixel detail that doesn't exist with it off, dlss is able to get you detail that you couldn't see before, where as fsr only takes away detail - you can set the level of detail removed but it never adds anything back
i call bs on this, like saying you can add quality back to a compressed audio file. nonsense, so how does it magically do that then? please explain in detail because id love to here it.
 
You see, the laws of physics don't apply when it comes to modern marketing using two layers of influence.

First you accept it's AI and is therefore capable of pseudo-magic, and then it becomes perfectly believable that it can add something out of thin air. The second part rests on the already established first part, which is already tightly interwoven into a target audience's subconscious, and which makes it extremely difficult for the target audience to let it go. It's like a trap within a trap, a door behind a door.

This is why modern constructs are so powerful and dangerous.
 
Back
Top Bottom