Johnson is not good enough. It's not bandwagon jumping. He's just not good enough. He's not the only one mind.
He was fine last night by and large, although he did lose the ball too frequently going forwards. No issues defensively.
Johnson is not good enough. It's not bandwagon jumping. He's just not good enough. He's not the only one mind.
He's asked to sit, cover the central defenders and start attacks. Most of the abuse seems to be because he's not as good as Pirlo in the Pirlo role which might be because he's only been doing it for half a seasonAs per my earlier post I think Gerrard was specifically told to play a certain way and do a certain thing which didn't really allow him to stand out at all. Reading through this thread and adding stuff people have said onto my own thoughts I'm increasingly getting the feeling they are holding Gerrard back intentionally for now.
At least have the decency to have a go at him when he does do something wrong, which is quite often, rather than when he does something right then![]()
He's asked to sit, cover the central defenders and start attacks. Most of the abuse seems to be because he's not as good as Pirlo in the Pirlo role which might be because he's only been doing it for half a season![]()
Phil Neville talking about paint.
As if he couldn't get any more boring.
Then how did you miss Johnson tracking the runner in to the box when the ball was crossed? Should he have let him run in to the box and score a free header?
Edit: Ah right, two people with poor eyesight then. Ignore the fact he did the correct thing, just jump on his back because it's Glen Johnson.
To be fair, it's quite costly to watch club football through Sky. The World Cup being on free to air means people who may not ordinarily be able to afford to watch Premier League football actually have a chance to see it.
NB. I've had Sky Sports all year... I just understand many people can't afford it/don't see value in it.
Yes, because fullbacks just pick a player and follow them till they die? At some point you have to pass off responsibility. He absolutely DID NOT do the right thing at all.
You know if that was Micah Richards he wouldn't have said a word about it.Pass him on to who? Cahill, who was marking Balotelli? If Johnson leaves his runner and he gets a free header he's then blamed for not tracking his runner.
. I often feel our media and fans over here read into the games / our players incorrectly.
Some people amaze me.
By and large we played well, certainly better than the other two teams in the group.
Johnson drifted in to the middle for no apparent reason before the cross went in
Well this is completely incorrect. Johnson went towards the front post to track the runner, which should have been Jagielka's job. Jagielka's should have called on Baines to drop, meaning that he wouldn't have had to cover behind Baines and instead would have picked up the runner at the front post.
First rule of basic defending is man marking. At no point do you leave the player you're tracking in order to double up on a different player, especially without knowing where the cross is going.
Cahill and Johnson picked up the a trackers in the box, but Jagielka was out of position because Baines was out of position because Welbeck didn't track back. The whole goal stemmed from Baines being left 2 on 1 and a lack of communication from Jagielka.
You can stream it for free. Doesn't take more than a willingness and google search.
I don't have sky but still watch all Arsenal games this way. Not perfect but still enjoyable.
Plus there's always motd![]()
.
I felt that was almost as good as England could play, I didn't think they were terrible, but Italy just showed their class. I think the Costa Rica game and the Uruguay game will be very difficult for England.
Hodgson has some big decisions to make this week; window or aisle.
I am amazed that the reaction to this defeat is so positive. Didn't see the game as close as some seemed to. Italy were a far more cohesive team. For me they completely dominated the midfield area. Pirlo again gave a master class. For me he was on a different level from anything England had. What surprised me was how advanced he played. De Rossi was the deep sitting player allowing Pirlo to have far more influence than I expected. He is a wonderful player and really gave a stark contrast between him and Gerrard, who was peripheral.
The plusses for England were that sterling and Sturridge had decent games albeit it looked as off they ran out of steam which is understandable given the conditions and the way that they play. Italy make the ball do the work which conserves energy.I always felt England were relying on individuals and high energy as their prime strategy. That's probably not the most sustainable way to play in such a sapping environment.
It's going to be tough now for them to go through.