Finally a judge with some sense?
- Thread starter Dis86
- Start date
In which case the onus is on Chris to back up his claim about immigrants, as he was the one that brought it up first.
Either way this is now completely off topic, it's not an immigrant thread...
Chris did make a claim about immigrants. Sliver however made a different claim, one that race...not immigration status makes no difference.
He's now changed his argument to sayinget white people do rape more women in this country. Something which is different to his original argument.
I'm not sure how that proves anything about immigrants and rapists.
From the article
So that says 13 were from "other countries including Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya.". Being black or mixed race doesnt mean you're an immigrant, and a large proportion of that is attributed to gang culture.
Ahh, I must have missed the post where it changed to race from immigration.
Edit: and that's also a reply to your post just above this one too.
Not just about race. Read it again, it mentions several demographics. As usual you are using a straw man fallacy against me.
There is no typical rapist. People who commit sexual violence come from every economic, ethnic, racial, age and social group.
Ahh, I must have missed the post where it changed to race from immigration.
Edit: and that's also a reply to your post just above this one too.
Don't follow your edit I'm afraid! However yes, the point I was challenging was that race seemingly makes no difference when statistics indicate that it does. As I say, Chris is making a different argument and quite frankly he's on his own as I have no clue whether he's right or wrong and I'm not entirely sure the stats are available either.
Ahh, I must have missed the post where it changed to race from immigration.
It never changed AMP, this is just Dis distorting the truth again.
Immigration touches many aspects of UK life
Sure Sliver...sure...
You can not really be this obtuse can you? Is this a wind up? Yes I quoted the 'Myth' then quoted the reality. Obviously my opinion is not aligned with the myth. Just stop trolling pal it's sad.
I didn't see your first reply about the change of subject, and only saw the second after I posted, hence the edit.
I didn't see your first reply about the change of subject, and only saw the second after I posted, hence the edit.
Ah right, I'm on board now! Anyways aye, I look forward to Chris fighting his corner on that one although as pointed out it's not the reason I made the thread.
Back on the original topic it looks like the judge is coming in for more flak and as expected few are willing to defend her as straight away they're getting hit with the rape apologist tag.
Without a doubt. Old people these days, being able to say whatever they want and get away with it!
Whatever the reason I'm sure she regrets it now. Not exactly ending on a high note. I think she probably felt this way all along and has by association been making bad sentencing calls regarding this issue throughout her career.
Bahahahaha and there goes all your credibility on the matter
Why lol ?¿?
What on earth?
Saying that she probably felt this way many years before she actually said something, suddenly means Sliver loses credibility?
I despair at the intelligence levels here sometimes.
She could have been thinking what she's finally said for the last 30 years lol. And it's most likely there was a substantial period of time between her initial thoughts and then actually saying something about it.
As usual you've taken something said and made a horrendous assumption out of it.
I don't see how her comments which are entirely common sense for any rational thinker mean she made bad rape case decisions throughout her career?