Floyd Mayweather vs Manny Pacquiao May 2 MGM Grand Las Vegas

drunkenmaster said:
Oh Pacman... come on really, raising your hands like you won, really? Pacman getting three rounds would be very generous, only because of those rounds where Mayweather gave him a chance, Pacman had a few bursts but most of even those rounds was Mayweather dominated.

Truly the best fighter I've seen, as I said, a shame no one is close to his level.
Click to expand...

Agree with most of that but on your last point this fight is at least 4 years too late in my opinion. Pacqiao is nearly 40 ffs.
 
Come on ppl! We got the fight we asked for - just not the one we wanted.

Mayweather is hugely talented - no doubt about it. Pacman didn't have enough to dismantle him but respect to both of them for bringing it to the Grand.

Not sure where it all goes from here :/

EDIT: Mayweather doesn't have anything left to prove. But he is still fighting in September. For a guy 2 years shy of 40, amazing legacy.
 
Ayahuasca said:
Agree with most of that but on your last point this fight is at least 4 years too late in my opinion. Pacqiao is nearly 40 ffs.
Click to expand...

Would have been nicer to see it a bit earlier, but Pacman is 36, Mayweather is 38. If either guy was going to be slower/less good at this stage it would be Mayweather. Obvious if Mayweather was the same at say 32-34 and Pacman was willing to take a few more hits when younger maybe it could have been a bit closer. But Pacman just didn't have it.

Disappointed he didn't try to change anything through the fight, his original plan didn't come close to working and he had no plan B, or C, or D and against Mayweather he should have had more plans than that.
 
You did nothing either though Manny lol

Also pretty sure just because he's younger doesn't mean he'd have slowed down less, also styles etc, pointless debate should've been done years ago, Mayweather timed it well
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom