Caporegime
Opps
As someone who does not watch boxing, Is this what you guys like? There was massive hype around it, For me this was a waste of time watching this, Rather boring.
I wonder what would happen if Mayweather fought Mayweather, would they stand in the middle not doing anything as they both wait for something to counter?
I'd give Pacquiao 2 rounds but no more than that.
Pretty boring to watch for me though. I can see why true boxing fans would enjoy watching him as he is technically brilliant but for average joe it's pretty boring.
I like to see good exchanges and contact not one guy backing off most of the time, same with heavyweight, I hate watching Klitschko's too, anytime somebody gets close they hug and it's just not entertaining.
Other fighters who were equally outclassed by Mayweather still managed to make a much better fight.
As said, disappointed he didn't do that really at all and disappointed in his post fight reaction, saying he thought he won and blaming Mayweather for you know, not standing there just to be hit as apparently Pacman thought he should have done.
Would someone like to explain this "running away" crap people always spout.
You can't run away in a ring, if the guy can't catch, corner or pressure you then it's your own fault for thinking he's just going to stand toe to toe with you in the middle of the ring.
You picked the wrong fight if you stayed up expecting a KO.
My favourite move was Mayweather's headlock, does he score points for those?
I will admit I am not the biggest boxing fan anymore, but I watched a lot in my younger days. Must consult the ole' rule book, also to look up points scoring as well (not that it was close, just me not remembering)
Fight was what I was expecting, won my bet at least.
Also, I'm surprised about Pacquiao's performance, it's not like Mayweather did anything he's not done before. I'm sure Manny studied the tapes. He's clearly in a league of his own.
Mayweather had no interest in the KO. For about 30 seconds in the 11th he looked interested
It was insanely dull.
So many times people see a headlock and blame the guy who puts his arm around the head... it's usually the guy ducking that low who is effectively causing the headlock, not the other way around. When one boxer ducks stupidly low and effectively has their shoulder in your ribs, you wrap them up, in that position that means holding his head otherwise as you let him up you're going to take an uppercut to the chin.
The reason to hold his head is to prevent an awkward uppercut and have the ref get the fighters to break without that potential punch. Pacman was unable to fight his way inside at all, so he was lunging in low and fast and trying to get into that position and hoping he'd get the chance to stand up and exchange some blows from the inside. It's 'crude' boxing at best and deserves the treatment it received from Mayweather. Pacman had no answers and no real plan, he was desperate to avoid the counter punch so was doing things such as a weak jab that normally missed then rushing in low. 99% of boxers would hold the opponents head if they were doing that all fight, including Pacman.
If Pacman kept his head up there would have been no headlocks, is was Pacman avoiding and causing the problem. Other holding, some of it was Pacman, some of it was Mayweather.
Mayweather threw 435 punches and lnaded 148, Pacman threw 429 and landed 81.
If Pacman had thrown more, Mayweather would have throw more as well.
Holding is a problem when one guy is throwing a massive number of punches and the other guy isn't, the guy not throwing holds to prevent being hit.
Mayweather was significantly out punching Pacman... he had no reason to hold intentionally or constantly. I say significantly outpunching because, when Mayweather decided to stand and cover Pacman probably got a significant portion of his hits in those exchanges, there was only 4-5 of them in the whole fight. Pacman was landing almost nothing outside of those few exchanges while Mayweather was landing all fight long.