• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Fritz Chess Benchmark/Super PI Thread 2010

Originally Posted by DavyBoy said:
Does anyone know whether RAM frequency makes any difference in these tests or not?.
Click to expand...

paradigm said:
RAM speed and timings definately have an impact on superpi.
Click to expand...

I've just tested this as I was curious to see the difference(If any). Super Pi / Fritz

i7 [email protected] + RAM@800MHz in Dual Channel = 15.273 / 9141
i7 [email protected] + RMA@1867MHz in Tri Channel = 15179 / 9925

i7 [email protected] + RAM@2000MHz in Dual Channel = 9.696 / 15442
i7 [email protected] + RAM@2000MHz in Tri Channel = 9.688 / 15459

Strange I know, the tri channel tests are slightly higher, but thats more likely to be the slight difference you get with almost all tests.

Still would have expected better though. :(


-------------------------------------------
ejr22 said:
bigjimmyauk said:
19:35

Originally Posted by bigjimmyauk
you want me to knock up a table?

20:12

Originally Posted by bigjimmyauk
anyone come up with an idea for a table cause i'm stumped

20:27

Originally Posted by bigjimmyauk
think geckovitch should do it it's been doing ok up to now lol
Click to expand...

That's some seriously quick table-fail! You let a table design defeat you in less than an hour? Come on dude, you've gotta man-up next time and not give in so easily!

Please don't take offence, I'm only joking. I just thought it was worth quoting/time-lining your no-contest submission to an instrument of viewing data. It tickled me.
Click to expand...

Me too, Quality. :D
 
Last edited:
Btw, I'd suggest using an automated .php script to generate the table (cache it and link to a .png or something, then re-generate that every time it gets updated).

That way you could automatically sort etc, populate the lists from an SQL database or similar, and even provide a way to more easily add entries.
 
paradigm said:
So something like:
  • Phenom II Quad
  • Phenom II Tri
  • Phenom II Dual
  • Athlon II Quad
  • Athlon II Dual
  • Athlon X2
  • Athlon 64
  • Other AMD

And I'd change "Older Intel" to "Other Intel", just incase someone shows up with their Atom, Celeron, or Pentium-Dual Core (which are no older than the other CPU's groups in the list, but less commonplace) :p
Click to expand...

You need Athlon II Tri cores too
 
Marine Iguana said:
Can i use my results from here or would you like me to have another go at it :D
Click to expand...

Results from here are fine, but seeing as we have one person (bar me) posting results already I would like to make people aware of the following:

Rules:

Unfortunately, like everything in life, there must be a few rules to abide by. This isn't to make things more awkward, it's just to simplify the collating of results, it's complex and time-consuming enough as it is. So, please, try to stick to the format below:
  • Only one entry per CPU architecture, per member. By default if you submit a faster result, your old result drops off the table to be replaced by the higher score.
  • Results must be posted with a screenshot, comprising of CPUz, SuperPi XS Mod v1.5, and Fritz Benchmark.
  • Please include your motherboard model, and your vCore with your screenshot.
  • Refrain from posting questions or comments in this thread, please use the other thread for this purpose.

Trunks9486 said:
You need Athlon II Tri cores too
Click to expand...

Noted, ta :)
 
Strawberry said:
Btw, I'd suggest using an automated .php script to generate the table (cache it and link to a .png or something, then re-generate that every time it gets updated).

That way you could automatically sort etc, populate the lists from an SQL database or similar, and even provide a way to more easily add entries.
Click to expand...

As far as I'm concerned, you have just volunteered yourself to set this up! That'll teach you for being so clever.
 
bigjimmyauk said:
only problem i see is the top 10 table will just be i7's
Click to expand...

Possibly, I guess it all depends on how far someone manages to push an i5/i3.

I might split the top-10's into Top-10 Fritz, and Top-10 SuperPi. That way, at least with the SuperPi it matters not how many threads you can run, but raw clockspeed. The current SuperPi World Record is held by an i5 ;)
 
easyrider said:
Yeah the idea is to compare Chips

So its pointless without having say a stock i7 920 in the table as there is no way of knowing how much faster it is than say a Q6600 @ 3.8ghz

Which is interesting rather than loads of 4ghz+ 920's at the top
Click to expand...

Hows about a board of Fastest, Middle, and Slowest of each class, all mixed into one table? Rather than the Top-10
 
paradigm said:
Hows about a board of Fastest, Middle, and Slowest of each class, all mixed into one table? Rather than the Top-10
Click to expand...

Fastest and stock will do.

I want to look and go wow thats a good upgrade from my Q6600@ 3.8ghz as that 920 running stock is faster.


This will help people have a refernce point for upgrades etc...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom