• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Fritz Chess Benchmark/Super PI Thread 2010

still think 3 scores would be better
stock,mid,high overclock that way we can get a half decent range without taking up to much table space

you want me to knock up a table?

maybe we should have a passing mod delete this thread and start a fresh then if anyone gets a higher score they just edit their original post?
 
Last edited:
easyrider said:
I would probably go for 2 tables

Stock clock per CPU
Fastest clock per CPU



So take mine for example

i7 920 C0/C1 Stock
i7 920 C0/C1 4 Ghz

Thoughts...
Click to expand...

Seems like a plan.

bigjimmyauk said:
still think 3 scores would be better
stock,mid,high overclock that way we can get a half decent range without taking up to much table space

you want me to knock up a table?

maybe we should have a passing mod delete this thread and start a fresh then if anyone gets a higher score they just edit their original post?
Click to expand...

If you're willing to take on table building duties then feel free, I'm struggling a bit as it is. With no broadband at the minute I'm getting results on my phone, writing them down, making a table on my pc, screen cap of the table, bluetooth to phone, upload. It's a little bit of a roundabout system :p
 
Stock with Turbo???

Let me know if you want the stock i5 750, should we be showing RAM as well if it impacts on SuperPI?

Maybe need some speed guidelines (ie what couts for 'mid') and then open it up on the rest?
 
paradigm said:
Only for the people that make it into the table.

One entry per person, per architecture would get my vote (to stop people using 6 different core2duo's etc).
Click to expand...

Sorry thick moment here how will that look?

you mean 1 entry per person per chip they own

so mine would be 4.1ghz run then if i got my athlon 64 up and running i could post 1 result for that aswell?
 
a table for each processor and different people do a table ?
and one entry per person at their highest overclock and 1 single entry at stock for a baseline
and all the older uncommon stuff in a table of its own
what program are you using to make your tables Geckovich ?
 
Last edited:
bigjimmyauk said:
Sorry thick moment here how will that look?

you mean 1 entry per person per chip they own

so mine would be 4.1ghz run then if i got my athlon 64 up and running i could post 1 result for that aswell?
Click to expand...

Correct, but if for example you owned an Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and a 4400+, you could only post one of them (one entry per architecture).
 
we could separate the table for the stock scores and have one for the overclocked ones
that way people would be able to see what they would get out of the box then check the other table to see various levels of overclocking
 
bigjimmyauk said:
anyone come up with an idea for a table cause i'm stumped
Click to expand...

Someone would have to organize the AMD table, as I'm not sure how to group them, but I'd go for something like this:

j79846.jpg


And then maybe have an overall table of the top-10, mixing all classes and manufacturers.
 
19:35
bigjimmyauk said:
you want me to knock up a table?
Click to expand...

20:12
bigjimmyauk said:
anyone come up with an idea for a table cause i'm stumped
Click to expand...

20:27
bigjimmyauk said:
think geckovitch should do it it's been doing ok up to now lol
Click to expand...

That's some seriously quick table-fail! You let a table design defeat you in less than an hour? Come on dude, you've gotta man-up next time and not give in so easily!

Please don't take offence, I'm only joking. I just thought it was worth quoting/time-lining your no-contest submission to an instrument of viewing data. It tickled me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom