Fury X Vs Titan X - Performance compared

humbug · 5 Jul 2015 at 13:20

Dicehunter said:
Just an idea but could it be because it's an AMD title ?

Genuinely curious about this.

Well i guess it could be but why? tho its not just BF4, yet it does seem to be the worst affected, PCars, Dirt... is subtle, you can only really see it with them side by side.
BF4, well, to me with a 290 it looks like i have a mixture of High and Medium settings, missing objects, Detail and Decal layers completely missing, much lower Draw Distance, low multisampling.

titaniumx3 · 5 Jul 2015 at 13:32

humbug said:
Its not that, it seems Nvidia Drivers reduce the Image Quality settings, BF4 seems to be the prime example of it, you can set Ultra in BF4 but the Nvidia CP over rides it without you knowing about it and runs IQ setting that look more like High or even Medium.

Read this thread.
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18679713

Yet theres there's loads of people on that very thread showing otherwise, who haven't touched anything in NVCP. On my 980ti ultra looks like ultra and there's no issue with anisotropic filtering. All NVCP settings are completely default.

How is this case?

Gregster · 5 Jul 2015 at 13:48

titaniumx3 said:
Yet theres there's loads of people on that very thread showing otherwise, who haven't touched anything in NVCP. On my 980ti ultra looks like ultra and there's no issue with anisotropic filtering. All NVCP settings are completely default.

How is this case?

I am betting it is something my end. others are clearly not having the same problem, so deffo points at user issues.

old gamer · 5 Jul 2015 at 14:27

yet again nice work gregg, but all these posts have me wanting to buy a fury x, not for the performance but theres something so damb intresting about it i just want to play about with one

Gregster · 5 Jul 2015 at 14:32

old gamer said:
yet again nice work gregg, but all these posts have me wanting to buy a fury x, not for the performance but theres something so damb intresting about it i just want to play about with one

Cheers bud and they are good cards.

I have just done a Batman comparison at 1440P and the results are very surprising. Just encoding it and will upload it straight away.

fs123 · 5 Jul 2015 at 14:34

An fps comparison between the 2 cards with the 'correct' NVCP settings applied would be nice. Does the Fury still lag behind or is the gap closed a bit. A 3 way video with the 2 TitanX settings and the FuryX is an idea.

Gregster · 5 Jul 2015 at 14:59

A tie perhaps?

UTmaniac · 5 Jul 2015 at 15:06

Gregster said:
15.15 AMD drivers -350.38 nvidia drivers
WIN 8.1 Pro
No dll or mods of any kind
No idea.

I'd expect at least AMD to perform better on Windows 10.

Grabbing the "1040" DLLs from http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=399547 should boost your AMD performance.

On a 6-core CPU, you should definitely see benefit from "-pthreads 4 -dx11mt" launch commands.

shankly1985 · 5 Jul 2015 at 15:36

Gregster said:
A tie perhaps?

Batman is very close indeed!

Silent_Scone · 5 Jul 2015 at 16:23

I was quite impressed with Fury X performance in Batman.

bake73 · 5 Jul 2015 at 16:38

humbug said:
Its not that, it seems Nvidia Drivers reduce the Image Quality settings, BF4 seems to be the prime example of it, you can set Ultra in BF4 but the Nvidia CP over rides it without you knowing about it and runs IQ setting that look more like High or even Medium.

Read this thread.
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18679713

Maybe you should follow your own advice as a few of us have posted pics that look nothing like gregsters.

Nice reviews BTW.

phatboy · 5 Jul 2015 at 18:59

cracking thread chap, only just spotted it

Kaapstad · 5 Jul 2015 at 19:07

What has happened to the detail in the water on the Fury X side of Gregsters video ?

Gregster · 5 Jul 2015 at 19:20

AMD shenanigans?

DXTory is a fantastic program for recording and great quality but needs to record to a SSD as the files are huge.

Edit:

Just paid close attention and the water is deffo 10x better on the TX - Something is deffo up with the water quality on AMD (watch from 1:32 and look at the water).

Gregster · 5 Jul 2015 at 21:29

Right, switched back to the Avermedia Cap card, as the files are just too damned big with DXtory and it bugged out so much it was really winding me up. A shame, as the quality was better with DXtory and the performance hit wasn't bad + I could record 1440P at 60fps but such a ballache to get going and kept crashing out in games as well as crashing Sony Vegas

Anyways, 3 more coming up this evening. Shadow of Mordor - Alien Isolation and The Witcher 3. All recorded with the capture card

Gregster · 5 Jul 2015 at 21:47

shankly1985 · 5 Jul 2015 at 23:44

Witcher 3 for me FuryX Textures look more detailed, like some extra sharpness, The colours again look much better.

Skynet5 · 5 Jul 2015 at 23:49

old gamer said:
yet again nice work gregg, but all these posts have me wanting to buy a fury x, not for the performance but theres something so damb intresting about it i just want to play about with one

I am thinking about a dedicated AMD gfx rig.

Why not...

dave_beast · 5 Jul 2015 at 23:51

shankly1985 said:
Witcher 3 for me FuryX Textures look more detailed, like some extra sharpness, The colours again look much better.

I think on nearly all the side by side reviews the TitanX's textures look blurrier with less detail.

uksoldierboy · 5 Jul 2015 at 23:55

Awesome stuff Greg good job bud

Could i ask what settings you were using on Witcher 3 please? currently playing through it and loving it so far.

Game is maxed out @1440p minus Hairworks and Fps seems to same around 55-65 with lows to 45.