Suspended
The 'success' or 'quality' of an adaptation has nothing to do with how closely they 'stay true' to the hypo-text.
It does to me.
The 'success' or 'quality' of an adaptation has nothing to do with how closely they 'stay true' to the hypo-text.
It does to me.
So the quality of actors, production do not matter at all? Nonsense.
Ignorance is bliss.
You just don't get it.
George is right in that we "don't get" why he would want a worse TV show.
Worse then what may I ask?
Worse than the TV series we do have?
A carbon-copy adaptation of the books to television wouldn't be great - I thought we were on the same page with that tbh.
Oh, sorry misread you. Been a long day baby sitting.
Given the flow of the thread I think it's fairly obvious that it wasn't.
Considering I've spent all year studying adaptation theory, will be my specialised area (probably with fantasy adaptation/fiction too) for my PhD, I disagree.
I think that it is you that does not get it.
The television show is a separate entity and an adaptation of the book, the fidelity theory (which is the theory you are unaware you are subscribed to) is the first, most basic, common theory and easiest to dismantle.
You're unwillingness to open in to any meaningful debate, weather for lack of understanding, stubbornness or obtuseness is boring as is your entire 'argument'.
Ignorance is bliss and you bore me , my advice would be to stop watching Game of Thrones.
Good luck in the real World. You'll need it.
Is that directed at me?