Gary Glitter returns to the UK- almost

excuse me Mr Glitter do you have anything to declare??


image001.jpg
 
Where do you get the idea that Thailand is tolerant of Drugs and Underage sex.?
You are in a world of pain if you get caught in Thailand with drugs or god forbid an underage girl.You would be begging them to send you back to the UK for trial.

I think he means that we don't have any morality, it's us living in the world of teenage pregnancy, drugs, ****s ruling the streets, comedy legal systems.
 
Last edited:
Mad or Bad?

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article4575628.ece

I agree with this:

if it's a mental disorder ...... section 'em and treat 'em.
If it's just a crime .... do the time and be free.

What we have now is ...... done the time, lets hound him for life; see the difference?

I don't condone his or any paedophile actions but let's at least be consistent.

Discuss.

but the fact is the time didnt fit the crime in most peoples opinion

shouldnt be let out for that sick **** he did
 
Most people, criminal or otherwise, don't see fit to abuse children for pleasure. Those that do, deserve all they get - I'd rather our children were protected, thanks. The only other option is to lock them away for good.
 
In November 1997 Glitter was arrested after child pornography images were discovered on the hard drive of a Toshiba laptop that he had taken to the Bristol Cribbs Causeway branch of PC World for repair.

rofl

Somebody didn't password his RAR's!
 
I don't really know much of this story except snippets from the news and the wikipedia page.

Knowing nothing about Vietnam I am just wondering how reliable the courts etc are there? Does anyone know on what evidence he was convicted?

This is purely a question and not a suggestion or opinion but could it be possible that he is actually innocent? (of the specific crime he was convicted of)
 
I don't really know much of this story except snippets from the news and the wikipedia page.

Knowing nothing about Vietnam I am just wondering how reliable the courts etc are there? Does anyone know on what evidence he was convicted?

This is purely a question and not a suggestion or opinion but could it be possible that he is actually innocent? (of the specific crime he was convicted of)
Even if he didn't molest the girls he deserves everything he gets after having the pictures on his PC in 1997.

However he basically admitted it already by saying he didn't know the age of consent was 18 or whatever.
 
Mad or Bad?

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article4575628.ece

I agree with this:

if it's a mental disorder ...... section 'em and treat 'em.
If it's just a crime .... do the time and be free.

What we have now is ...... done the time, lets hound him for life; see the difference?

I don't condone his or any paedophile actions but let's at least be consistent.

Discuss.

Not much to discuss really. He has been in and out of prision both here and abroad for the exact same reasons. Just because he does the time does that mean he will change his sick ways? Probably not.

I'd say the best way to deal with these sickos is to cut off there **** and balls.

He should be forced back here and also do time here in a conventional prison, then afterwards do the same amount of time inside a mental hospital.
 
Back
Top Bottom