Poll: General election voting intentions poll

Voting intentions in the General Election - only use the poll if you intend to vote

  • Alliance Party of Northern Ireland

    Votes: 2 0.3%
  • Conservative

    Votes: 287 42.0%
  • Democratic Unionist Party

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Green Party

    Votes: 67 9.8%
  • Labour

    Votes: 108 15.8%
  • Liberal Democrat

    Votes: 25 3.7%
  • Other party (not named)

    Votes: 15 2.2%
  • Plaid Cymru

    Votes: 2 0.3%
  • Respect Party

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Scottish National Party

    Votes: 36 5.3%
  • Social Democratic and Labour Party

    Votes: 1 0.1%
  • Sinn Fein

    Votes: 4 0.6%
  • UKIP

    Votes: 137 20.0%

  • Total voters
    684
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Cameron's chance for a second term was scuppered the moment he didn't reverse the constituency boundary changes put in under Labour and ban postal votes.

The Conservative party brought that on themselves didn't they? Ignored the coalition agreement on Lords Reform so the LibDems ignored the coalition and voted against the constituency changes.

Oh, and constituency boundaries are set by the Boundaries Commission, not the government so you can't blame Labour for the current constituencies :D
 

My point was that some time back they were predicted at 4 seats by May2015, now their prediction is 3 seats. Likewise ladbrokes have gone from 5.5 seats down to 4.5 seats


I leave it to the viewers what they think this trend will mean come voting time, that is a mere weeks away now.


You seem proud that UKIP might win 3 seats, but that is fairly meaningless compared to say the SNP expected to pick up 49, Tories to loose 31 and Labour to gain 9. 3 seats is just noise.
 
Which is all there members are good for. :D

No UKIP are good for breaking the stupid pleb system of people voting for colours. Having a couple party system is stupid and is dangerous. Look at America for a stupid system where 300,000,000 people allowed themselves to be corraled into two parties.

Like UKIP or not, they are bringing about debates and helping to open up politics (Even if its only by a tiny amount). The issue of immigration is a contentious topic, and no matter what side of the fence you are on, both sides deserve to be represented.
 
I'm warming to Ed. This interview with him is brilliant. Ed is just that little bit more human than Dave or Nick - and I think that's a good thing. There's a sincerity in what he says that's missing from the other two.

Had the exact kind of conversation earlier... He needs to be a bit more David Cameroon though to give you the feel that he would be ok on an international stage. At the moment, I think we wouldnt be that good, but then, who knows.

Nick Clegg on the other hand has the best of both worlds. He seems more Human than Dave, but less than Ed, but more statesman than Ed, but less than Dave.
 
No UKIP are good for breaking the stupid pleb system of people voting for colours. Having a couple party system is stupid and is dangerous. Look at America for a stupid system where 300,000,000 people allowed themselves to be corraled into two parties.

Like UKIP or not, they are bringing about debates and helping to open up politics (Even if its only by a tiny amount). The issue of immigration is a contentious topic, and no matter what side of the fence you are on, both sides deserve to be represented.

Rofl, they are tiny far smaller than lib dem.
 
The biggest mistake labour made was allowing that back-stabbing little turd Milliband to take the reigns at the expense of this (electable) elder brother.

Even die hard Labour supporters acknowledge he's a liability.

Besides, no career politicians are 'normal' people, they are career Westminster drones.

Well said, Milliband has a bumbling charmless persona with no charisma whatsoever.
 
Rofl, they are tiny far smaller than lib dem.

For now, it's only because of our FPTP system that the LibDems won't be decimated on May 7th. UKIP has been polling almost twice as much as the LibDems for the past 12 months

LibDems can count themselve lucky that they are only going to lose half their seats, it takes two election cycles for a trend to take hold, if for 2020 it's still UKIP 14% and LD 8%, then it would switch and UKIP would have 30 seats and LD only have 5 at best
 
Last edited:
LibDems can count themselve lucky that they are only going to lose half their seats, it takes two election cycles for a trend to take hold, if for 2020 it's still UKIP 14% and LD 8%, then it would switch and UKIP would have 30 seats and LD only have 5 at best

No, that's not how it works. In order to convert votes to seats, they'll need to concentrate that vote in particular areas and build local support. UKIP's hope should build from local councillors, and their MEPs, but their local councillors are pretty poor and their MEPs are downright terrible.
 
No UKIP are good for breaking the stupid pleb system of people voting for colours. Having a couple party system is stupid and is dangerous. Look at America for a stupid system where 300,000,000 people allowed themselves to be corraled into two parties.

Like UKIP or not, they are bringing about debates and helping to open up politics (Even if its only by a tiny amount). The issue of immigration is a contentious topic, and no matter what side of the fence you are on, both sides deserve to be represented.

Eh, do you have any idea how insignificant the UKIP are right now, they have far less seats than Lib dems.


The Green party is bringing about far more healthy debate rather than the xenophobic bigoted garbage coming from UKIP.
 
For now, it's only because of our FPTP system that the LibDems won't be decimated on May 7th. UKIP has been polling almost twice as much as the LibDems for the past 12 months

LibDems can count themselve lucky that they are only going to lose half their seats, it takes two election cycles for a trend to take hold, if for 2020 it's still UKIP 14% and LD 8%, then it would switch and UKIP would have 30 seats and LD only have 5 at best

You still don't understand how voting in the UK works I see.
UKIP have 13% of the vote scattered all over the places in constituencies that they will never win. The liberal democrats have 8% of the vote with a high proportion of votes in constituencies that they will win or have a good chance of winning.


UKIP will need to reverse that trend to gain more than 2-4 seats.
 
I'm looking forward to hearing what Natalie Bennett has to say tonight.
Should go something like "erm.. well.. erm.. urr.. oh.. well, umm..w..w...w...we're going to go to..ermm.. to erm.. do, uh.."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom