I've not felt any austerity? Is it because I work?
If you earn even just a little more than minimum wage this Coalition has been good for you.
I've not felt any austerity? Is it because I work?
If you earn even just a little more than minimum wage this Coalition has been good for you.
Love that picture. The text is a bit misleading though, since cigarettes and alcohol do actually take a long time to kill you, and are both heavily taxed, so I'm quite sure most smokers / drinkers in the country have paid for their NHS treatment already.
40% is a huge margin though. It means we are almost halfway there. Compared to other approaches, I think we have done well.
This is false; the extra tax contribution does not pay for the increased health costs.
UKIP polling looking strong again, nice to see, but the number of Labour votes is disappointing, have people forgotten the 2008 crash already? Last time those lefty retards were given the reins they financially ruined the entire country.
There are a lot of UKIP votes here. The only thing I like about them is that they've given the main parties a kick up the backsides.
yes it does the tax on tobacco brings in about 9 billion a year in tax treatment for smoking related issues is about 2.5-3 billion
so yeah it pays for the health costs then 6 billion extra on top.
Won't that rather depend on how you're defining smoking related diseases (how widely you cast that particular net) and whether you're talking purely about medical treatments or including the wider costs to society and the economy (e.g. sickness absences for treatment etc)?
Would things have really been any different had the Conservatives been in power at the time?
yes it does the tax on tobacco brings in about 9 billion a year in tax treatment for smoking related issues is about 2.5-3 billion
so yeah it pays for the health costs then 6 billion extra on top.
The fact is though, they weren't in power and hadn't been since 1997. Labour had plenty of years to sort the financial market out, but chose not to.
The fact is though, they weren't in power and hadn't been since 1997. Labour had plenty of years to sort the financial market out, but chose not to.
One thing for sure, we will never know if it would have been different..............................what we do know though is that the current government has gone a long way in sorting out the mess left by the last. I for one would not be happy with the same lot financial misfits back in to put us back to where we were 5 years ago.
The fact is though, they weren't in power and hadn't been since 1997. Labour had plenty of years to sort the financial market out, but chose not to.
One thing for sure, we will never know if it would have been different..............................what we do know though is that the current government has gone a long way in sorting out the mess left by the last. I for one would not be happy with the same lot financial misfits back in to put us back to where we were 5 years ago.
Do you have a reliable source for these figures?
When Labour has not one person who was involved with the 1997-2010 government then they should be reconsidered. That was the worst government the UK ever had and there should be no chance of ever returning to that.