You sometimes have to tear something down in order to rebuild it.
Universal Credit has got more "cripples" back to full health than Jesus did.
Many think Major Ian Smith is responsible for thousands of suicides I saw one count of 13,000 a year ago.
You sometimes have to tear something down in order to rebuild it.
Universal Credit has got more "cripples" back to full health than Jesus did.
Many think Major Ian Smith is responsible for thousands of suicides I saw one count of 13,000 a year ago.
His point (I think) was about reducing income inequality - you can either do that after tax, by making sure high income people pay more tax so that people on low incomes keep a greater proportion of their income, or you can do it before tax and make sure there aren't as many people on high incomes so that companies have more money to redistribute to lower earners.
I'll bite, where does that number come from?
Don't recall just something I came across on the web do a search if you're interested, I was only chatting not making a big issue.
Insinuating one man and his policy is somehow responsible for 13,000 suicides is some chat.
He said Germany do it.
Their tax rate appears comparable to our own.
So his point appears to be invalid unless I am missing something regarding Germany.
The greens have announced a 60p top rate of tax this morning.![]()
The greens have announced a 60p top rate of tax this morning.![]()
Maybe they have less income inequality before taxation. I know they have much more union representation, including at board level in Germany, be interesting to know if they have zero hours contracts over there, somehow I doubt it. I think the make up of the German economy also helps avoid extreme income inequality - they're famous for having an economy based on lots of medium sized companies, rather than few mega-corps we have here in the UK.
Used to be 98% when I was a lad, at what figure does it start?
£150,000 off the top of my head.
The bottom 10%, the poorest people in this country, across all forms of taxation, pay 45% tax on their income.....
Where as the top 10% pay just 33%..
This needs to stop, right here, right now.
and a good analogy I saw somewhere (could have been here) is that it should not come from "how can we tax the rich more", but from how we should tax the poor less!.
Also what needs to stop is the ridiculous practice of taxing the lowest earners and then handing it back in benefits.
The bottom 10%, the poorest people in this country, across all forms of taxation, pay 45% tax on their income.....
Where as the top 10% pay just 33%..
This needs to stop, right here, right now.
and a good analogy I saw somewhere (could have been here) is that it should not come from "how can we tax the rich more", but from how we should tax the poor less!.
Agreed because the taking then giving back is a huge waste of time and effort.