Germany and cannabis laws...

If Gambling and alcohol are legal then there's no reason weed should be illegal. I occasionally smoke it socially (a couple of times a year basically) and I know quite a few people who do, for it to be illegal is stupid.
 
Last edited:
fair point - but aren't the levels of criminality lower?

you're comparing apples and oranges really, as nearly all activity associated with one of those things is currently illegal however counterfeit alcohol alone is a billion pound industry and cigarettes a multi-billion pound industry. So the criminality aspect is very significant!
 
you're comparing apples and oranges really, as nearly all activity associated with one of those things is currently illegal however counterfeit alcohol alone is a billion pound industry and cigarettes a multi-billion pound industry. So the criminality aspect is very significant!

Good point. I guess where criminals see an opportunity they'll exploit it. I wonder though whether controlling drugs like cannabis more will generate enough income to help mitigate some of the criminal activity?
 
People here are mooting the advantages of taxing drugs as a means of (presumably) bringing money into whatever country is weak enough or fearful enough to legalise the stuff...

I wonder what tax level these people envisage?
Presumably homegrown would be untaxable. Shops could just charge vat and think of all the money saved by not policing.
 
will Gen Covid have time to smoke weed as well as vaping.

so - it becomes legal - employers, like mine, can still give you random drugs tests, and then fire you if they wished; apparently police get fired if they have steroids in their blood.
 
I’m against it, can bring on or worsen mental health conditions in people susceptible to it. I should know I have mental health issues myself (not due to cannabis use) and the amount of people I’ve met with mental health problems that have been cannabis users themselves.

The more potent strains (now the commonest on the street), like Skunk, were only developed in the first place because it was illegal. The black market wanted a strain that produced a high concentration of THC as quickly as possible, since that maximised profits and minimised the risk that grows would be found by the Police and confiscated. Skunk plants have a high THC/low CBD ratio, which increases the risk that genetically susceptible heavy users will experience psychotic episodes. There is a DNA test now which can identify people at high-risk of developing cannabis psychosis. Cannabis strains commonly available in the 1960s and 70s had roughly equal ratios of THC/CBD and so they were far less likely to cause psychosis. Medical cannabis strains (used for centuries in Indian traditional medicine) have high CBD/low THC ratios and were actually successfully used to treat mental illnesses. (CBD is known to be a potent antipsychotic and so it counteracts the psychiatric side-effects of THC.)

A very bad idea, the old "thin of the wedge" and probably a sap to the German authorities having lost the resources to police any law against drug usage, where will it end? If it were tempered by a new law saying being under the influence of marijuana was not a get out clause for criminality it might gain some sane traction...

Drug dealers do not follow ethical standards of behaviour, they only seek to maximise their profits. If the government truly wants to limit the damage done by cannabis then it should legalise, regulate and tax it. That way, its availability can be controlled and those that use it can be protected from dangerous product, in the same way that any other legal industry has to provide a safe good quality product or be prosecuted. The tax revenue raised from its legal sale would be in the hundreds of millions every year and a similar amount would simultaneously be saved on law enforcement and prisons.

Chris has a point though. People who drink alcohol are living within the law, Cannabis growers/smokers are breaking the law

Cannabis was made illegal for recreational use here on 28th September 1928 as an amendment to the Dangerous Drugs Act 1920, which itself was an update of the first UK drug prohibitions in the Defence of the Realm Act 1914. (There was a panic at the beginning of World War I about British soldiers using cocaine and it was feared that the Germans were trying to damage the British Army's effectiveness with it so the government rushed to ban it.)

The Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 created the current Class A, B and C drug classification system. It was passed by Edward Heath's government and was inspired by Richard Nixon's "War on Drugs" policies in the USA. However, it had the paradoxical result of doubling the number of heroin addicts in the UK in just a few years and so it maximised the harm done by that drug.
 
I believe it should be legal here too. Not because I'm a user to any degree, but where it is legalised and taxed we can have mandatory strength indicators (how much CBD vs THC is in each strain), and we know it's grown to some degree of controlled quality, rather than getting it from the local dealer and hoping it's not too weak/strong. That'd make things a lot more controlled if it became legal, IMO.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom