Totally agree. Its stinking horrible mind bending stuff.
So is religion
Totally agree. Its stinking horrible mind bending stuff.
I don't like people who drink alcohol. Or post on forums.
Oh wait...
But your view is a worthless opinion without any supporting evidence , let alone your logic seems deeply flawed. If people turning up under the influence of drugs or alcohol are such a critical problem then one of them should be illegal then this has to apply to both, and you should be proposing to ban alcohol to be logically consistent.
Very much so.I also don't believe my thinking is flawed purely because the attitudes towards alcohol consumption and smoking weed are clearly different, it's not just if one is legal or not.
Are we ever going to do the smart thing. The amount of money raised from the tax could be used for beneficial things.
Nah, lets keep the money going to criminals
It's a good point, tax could be used in government drug stores to provide help for those wishing to kick any habit.Are we ever going to do the smart thing. The amount of money raised from the tax could be used for beneficial things.
Nah, lets keep the money going to criminals
Of course they are and there will always be people who will go the criminal route. I know even in America and Canada in some states people still go for the illegal route as it undercuts the dispensaries.According to (I think it was him who posted it) Dis86, both the criminal alcohol and tobacco trades are multi billion industries and both those things are legal. I don't think legalising it is going to suddenly mean criminals aren't going to profit out of it.
It's a good point, tax could be used in government drug stores to provide help for those wishing to kick any habit.
At the moment it's just ignored beyond paying for prison time. Hell, I know for a fact some people have committed criminal damage just to get a sentence so they can get on to a drug treatment programme quicker.
Then why join a forum or even read one...
Oh wait... Weed that's right good for the brain.
Unfortunately the reefer madness argument isn’t nonsense. A lot of MH patients I’ve met due to my own MH issues have been cannabis smokers or indeed alcoholics. It’s safe for some but not everybody. Alcohol and cigarettes should be banned too but it’s too late for that.That's how I feel. I'm a liberal person though so I believe people should be able to take whatever they wish. What I do want though is a lot of education around drugs. Not the scare mongering reefer madness nonsense but actual objective facts so that people go into doing something knowing the risks.
What % of the overall market for those legal things does that represent? Currently weed is 100% in the hands of criminals*, no one is expecting that to be 0% when its legalised but its still important to reduce it as much as possible. You'd think the amount of transactions not being taxed would be enough to convince the government to get involved.According to (I think it was him who posted it) Dis86, both the criminal alcohol and tobacco trades are multi billion industries and both those things are legal. I don't think legalising it is going to suddenly mean criminals aren't going to profit out of it.
Unfortunately the reefer madness argument isn’t nonsense. A lot of MH patients I’ve met due to my own MH issues have been cannabis smokers or indeed alcoholics. It’s safe for some but not everybody. Alcohol and cigarettes should be banned too but it’s too late for that.
Why legalize another potentially harmful substance.
It's about time it was here too
For those complaining about the smell legalisation would more than likely reduce the amount of people physically smoking weed. Based on observation of things in Canada, far more people consume their cannabis either by vapes, or edibles.
Then why join a forum or even read one...
Oh wait... Weed that's right good for the brain.
You don’t need to take it, I assume you’re not addicted. If it affects 10 people positively and 1 person negatively then it should still be banned. The potential to cause harm is the key. The only good thing about legalizing it is that it may be less potent but more people will take it up like people drink to excess now because it’s legal.While it is very unfortunate for those it negatively effects, how about those that it positively effects? Do they not matter either?
You don’t need to take it, I assume you’re not addicted. If it affects 10 people positively and 1 person negatively then it should still be banned. The potential to cause harm is the key. The only good thing about legalizing it is that it may be less potent but more people will take it up like people drink to excess now because it’s legal.
You don’t need to take it, I assume you’re not addicted. If it affects 10 people positively and 1 person negatively then it should still be banned. The potential to cause harm is the key. The only good thing about legalizing it is that it may be less potent but more people will take it up like people drink to excess now because it’s legal.
Yeah but paracetamol won’t cause someone to have a psychotic episode.You don't need to take paracetamol if you have a headache but people do because it helps.