IG's are a lot of nonsense.
In my experience they are reasonably accurate until you get to the very high groups.
IG's are a lot of nonsense.
What do you want a derv for?


people like dervs.
get over it!
[TW]Fox;12227621 said:Some do, but even more buy them because they think they need one because it does 5mpg more.
with the fuel prices ever increasing, the money saved by a 'petty' 5-15mpg will surely take priority.
with the fuel prices ever increasing, the money saved by a 'petty' 5-15mpg will surely take priority.
you can hoon a half decent derv all day long and never drop 40-45mpg, a typical equivilant petrol can drop as low as 15-25mpg.
tidy up nicely too![]()
[TW]Fox;12228705 said:Well yea, if it isn't cancelled out by the purchase price and the price of buying a new turbo.
[TW]Fox;12228705 said:You don't really seem to have a clue, do you? The sort of diesel that wont ever drop below 40-45mpg even when 'hooning' will be something like a 1.4 TDI, perhaps at a push one of the super slow 2.0's. The more powerful ones will be comfortably below 40mpg.
Whereas the type of petrol which will show you 15mpg will be large and/or turbocharged and offer considerable perfrmance - therefore not equivilent.

new turbo?!! in most instances, maybe towards the 200k mark, but hell, most people aren't keen on keeping/purchasing such a car with this mileage anyway.
i stand by my statement. a quick look over on the TDI/HDI forums will show a host of many 150-200bhp dervs, myself included, with owners that claim they never drop 40mpg on a rather aggressive drive.
for someone who still assumes the typical derv is smokey, noisy and generally lacking power low down, you barely have a leg to stand on with that statement. things have changed since your 1.9TD![]()
i stand by my statement. a quick look over on the TDI/HDI forums will show a host of many 150-200bhp dervs, myself included, with owners that claim they never drop 40mpg on a rather aggressive drive.
for someone who still assumes the typical derv is smokey, noisy and generally lacking power low down, you barely have a leg to stand on with that statement. things have changed since your 1.9TD![]()

[TW]Fox;12229292 said:Commonrail turbo and injector issues are unfortunately a little more common than you like to suggest.
not as a 'common' known problem anyway.[TW]Fox;12229292 said:They must have a rather different opinion on aggresive driving, then.
[TW]Fox;12229292 said:Have they? I'd never have known that. Good job you are around with a 2.0 HDi to tell me how great diesels are now.
It's not as if I drive them all the time, is it?
I would suggest that the 2008 BMW 2 litre diesel I am currently driving, and the 2002 3 litre diesel I frequently drive, are rather more refined, powerful, efficient and altogether just plain better than your Citroen so please don't suggest I'm judging all diesels on a Xantia I owned years ago.
They are good engines - very good, infact, but not so much better than the equivilent petrol engines as you'd like to make us think they are.
i love the banter. i'm just saying how good they are on juice, regardless of the driving style, not once did i claim they are 'better' engines.
stop trying to get personal and listen to the point in question.![]()
I just went out and took that from my mum's 06 plate Focus 1.8 TDCi. 37.7mpg it says, averaged over a few thousand miles. Never drop below 40mpg do they?
and tell your mum to get the car looked into, that aint right
unless its mainly urbanI love diesel fanboys![]()
