Ghostbusters: Afterlife

This.

This is how it should have been all along. A doffing of the cap to the original not a dismissal of it like Ghostbusters 2016

The 2016 movie was the most confused pile of **** i've ever seen. The first trailer makes direct reference to the events of the original movie then they try and say it has nothing to do with it. Add to the fact that you have a director who's only ever had real success in parody movies, and thinks men "aren't funny" and it was a recipe for disaster from the start. Every male character in the 2016 movie was either incredibly thick, a complete ass, or a combination of both.

They should have made it a parody movie and i doubt anyone would have batted an eyelid.
 
Kevin was actually the only funny character in the 2016 film.


Didn't even find him funny to be honest, his character was so stupid it was just cringey. Only thing i found mildly amusing was the University dean finding different ways to flip them off before they got kicked out.
 
IOl7jYY.png

Looks to be Gozer making the return in that part of the trailer, hair looks right, long fingernails, the blueish suit it was wearing at the end of the first movie.
 
The trailers look like a WAY WAY better attempt. Will watch it with great hope anyways

Well it doesn't have an idiot in charge that has some weird distrust of men because he got bullied in school, all Feig (guess what his nickname was in school) seems to do is make parodies with women in place of the men for some reason.
 
I don't mean serious as in, not funny or not fantasy, I mean serious as in all the compromises that are made for it being made for kids, not for grown-ups. How many kids were the main actors in the first GB film?

None obviously as it was about 3 men starting a business.



Wonder who it is in the trailer that's using the pke meter, that was basically egons gadget, and its obviously not one of the kids using it. Wonder if its a flashback to when Egon was still alive and they have a cg version of him in a few scenes.
 
International trailers are really no different besides slightly different camera angles and a head on look at the gozer statue, and a look at a terror dog statue.

SykrIXp.png

MgucS28.png
 
The more I see this it seems a good re-visit to the original film re: Gozer - they just destroyed one possible portal?


Gozer was a good choice to bring back as it has had numerous incarnations in different worlds going by the storyline, also it was never destroyed, it's avatar was with Gozer's essence being thrown back through the gate and the door shut. Would make for a more interesting storyline if Gozer appears much earlier in this movie so the character can have some screen time and development, vs only appearing for a few moments in the original. It looks like thats whats going to happen going by the trailer as they seem to be exploring the temple when Gozer is making its return.

Thinking about it there's a lot of other things they could also address, did Gozer experience the passage of time or was it like an instant door opening after being pushed back into its own dimension? Will it recognise the original Ghostbusters? Will it get a destructor form? Stay Puft is hinted at with the possibility of the mini pufts combining but the trailer with the voice over with Jason Reitman seems to suggest otherwise. Is Gozer a Red Herring and will something more powerful emerge?
 
Last edited:
There are certain cinematic sounds which do that to me, the ecto-1 siren is one, the top gun chime is another, the tracker noise from Aliens is another.


The ecto siren is an odd one, if you watch gb2 at the start of the movie where the car drives along puffing out smoke it has a different sound, gb1 it's more electronic sounding, gb2 it's more horn like. Plus in the gb1 movie during the montage it also has a different faster sounding siren.

 
This could be fun. Adam geeking out with the cast and crew and props.



It's funny at just how little there is inside the proton pack but Bill Murray still complains about the weight, its mainly aluminium, fibreglass, a battery and a few lights. They were a lot heavier in the first 2 movies due to the batteries they used being massive and the packs had more metal components.

Interesting seeing inside the pack and the cyclotron light is now a light on a spinning mechanism instead of 4 seperate lights that go on and off in sequence.


BMNTqcE.png
 
He is a lot older now though so they will still be heavy. I've put on a full size pack and with the batteries and speaker etc it really is heavy.

The originals with battery were in the region of 50lbs (though Dan Aykroyd has claimed much heavier contrary to the prop makers), the newer ones are less than half that, 20-25lbs or thereabouts.
 
Is that one of the originals or one of the new ones they made for Afterlife? There are differences. The wand has a new handle, new wiring and there's a quick connect on the wand as well. ;)

The afterlife ones were all scratch built, presumably the shotgun grip is only on the spengler "wand" as there was a toy version sold with the name spengler wand.

Nice to see they haven't deviated too much from the originals, well so far from what has been shown at least.

I have the parts to make a wand up, just never got round to it :( No clue about electronics either so that's part of the problem.
 
But another friend has a fully 3D printed one and it's about half that weight.


Seen a few of those, not bad looking but take an age to print.

Really wanted to get an aluminium wand and have it be an all in one with light and sound, very tight fit to say the least. Though there's a handful of people that make them out of aluminium and none are taking orders currently. =/
 
Back
Top Bottom