Hmm well what im thinking was adding killing three birds with one stone. No idea if this will work but give me your thoughts. So theres strength training at say 5 sets by 5 reps. Moderate muscle building/definition training at 3 sets by 10/12 reps, and also endurance training at say 3 sets of 30 reps.
Now if I did say a 3 day split hitting the same exercises on the muscle groups, would it really be considered over-training? I mean the benefits seem glorifying, hitting the muscle groups 3 times per week but hitting them in different ways, obviously leaving a day or 2 in between or recovery time, but it could work. Choosing main exercises, your compound ones of Squats, Deadlifts and Bench Press and adding in some other important ones for each muscle section it could be attainable, it would be a long workout, yes but the results hmmm?
I was thinking of hitting a 3 day split of weights like that and rotating it each time, for example Strength, muscle build, endurance. And then for 2 seperate days I could have some tough cardio sessions so im not incorporating the extreme cardio after weights as Morba would suggest against, and then possibly adding in ab exercises on those cardio days, just some simple work to chip some time off the other days.
Give me your thoughts people!
sounds a lot like a bill starr 5x5..
http://www.geocities.com/elitemadcow1/5x5_Program/Linear_5x5.htm
i tried it for a few months last year, didnt work for me as much as a split does, but might give it a try again in the future