Dr_Evil said:Issuing Licenses to drink Alcohol and revoking them when misbehaving, like in this case.
Can't believe you'd even suggest advocating such a law.
What next? A license to breathe?
Dr_Evil said:Issuing Licenses to drink Alcohol and revoking them when misbehaving, like in this case.
Chipping peopleRichdog said:And how would you suggest enforcing that?
NiCkNaMe said:Can't believe you'd even suggest advocating such a law.
What next? A license to breathe?
It's actually quite easy. Take their details on their first offence and ban them. If they get caught again, it's JAIL time.Richdog said:And how would you suggest enforcing that?
NiCkNaMe said:Can't believe you'd even suggest advocating such a law.
What next? A license to breathe?
They have ASBOs for that sort of thing.phykell said:It's actually quite easy. Take their details on their first offence and ban them. If they get caught again, it's JAIL time.
phykell said:It's actually quite easy. Take their details on their first offence and ban them. If they get caught again, it's JAIL time.
My problem is not how to house criminals and that's a whole different issue which I won't go into here, but how about criminals actually *pay* for their time inside as well? Why should taxpayers pay to process *and* detain anyway?Richdog said:Can you imagine the pressure that would put on the already pressured jails due to the sheer number of people that would be ignoring the ban? It's not feasible imo.
phykell said:My problem is not how to house criminals and that's a whole different issue which I won't go into here, but how about criminals actually *pay* for their time inside as well? Why should taxpayers pay to process *and* detain anyway?
Mr Nice said:And we'll never find out either
Chrisp7 said:Seriously guys what a bloody mountain out of a molehill. It was very very obviously not true. On Ocuk would discuss something over nothing!
I found it amusing - he shouldnt have been banned!
Stellios said:I mean 10 minutes ago he admitted to messing his pants in public, very alpha male by the way, and now attacking a bloke with a stool.
Nix said:First he crapped himself and then he attacked someone with his stool? Nasty.
It's probably best to move this to SC as I have lots of ideasRichdog said:Yeah, them paying would be fantastic for us over-burdened tax-payers, I agree. But realistically given the current situation, what you suggest wouldn't be easily enforceable by any stretch of the imagination.
Rotty said:he wasn't banned for this
Datamonkey said:lol can you tell us who he is really, his other account
please be tommy knockers lol