Greedy Gallas?

JohnnyG · 5 Sep 2006 at 20:03

kdd said:
Btw nice bit of commie claptrap for a 'man of honour'. So, to be a man of honour you need to be a girlishly spiteful milkman?

Of course not, there are 14 MOH, only 8 are girlishly spiteful milkmen.

kdd · 5 Sep 2006 at 20:04

JohnnyG said:
It's not an image it's fact, looks like you've sold your soul to the government, hope they give it back.

lol nice try milkman. Never knew there was such radicalism in the ranks of milkmen!

JohnnyG · 5 Sep 2006 at 20:05

kdd said:
lol nice try milkman. Never knew there was such radicalism in the ranks of milkmen!

At least we can be radical, you must obey

kdd · 5 Sep 2006 at 20:06

JohnnyG said:
At least we can be radical, you must obey

Lol nice try milkman. Who are you copying this pseudo radical claptrap from then?

JohnnyG · 5 Sep 2006 at 20:08

kdd said:
Lol nice try milkman. Who are you copying this pseudo radical claptrap from then?

Wolfie Smith, power to the people bruvver...

kdd · 5 Sep 2006 at 20:08

JohnnyG said:
Wolfie Smith, power to the people bruvver...

Is he a milkman as well?

JohnnyG · 5 Sep 2006 at 20:11

kdd said:
Is he a milkman as well?

Not anymore, he retired to the Seychelles, splitter :mad:

LionOfJudah · 5 Sep 2006 at 20:33

kdd and johnnyg: guys discussion way off topic now.please leave all cat fights at home. cheers

G|mp · 5 Sep 2006 at 20:45

****ing hell its in here as well :mad:

Raymond Lin · 5 Sep 2006 at 20:45

i wonder what the Arsenal fans will think of him if he score an own goal on his debut...

alx · 5 Sep 2006 at 20:49

G|mp said:
****ing hell its in here as well

kdd said:
still say chelsea are b*ggered when makelele retires, also how much bottom kissing did you have to do to be a 'man of honour'? Seriosuly you're rude and arrogant and like making judgements against people not very honourable.
Btw had a look in your profile and it says you're a milkman. Explains a lot, don't get uppity with me delivery boy.

Looks like it started in here

Gooner14 · 5 Sep 2006 at 20:49

For some odd reason Gallas has changed his squad number already! He was 3 at the Start of the week, he now has number 10 :confused:

Whats that all about!!

JohnnyG · 5 Sep 2006 at 20:49

Gooner14 said:
For some odd reason Gallas has changed his squad number already! He was 3 at the Start of the week, he now has number 10

Whats that all about!!

He had 3 at Chelsea, bad memories?

Edit: He was actually 13 at Chelsea & only got the 3 when he started mucking about & Ballack was given the 13

kdd · 5 Sep 2006 at 20:50

Gooner14 said:
For some odd reason Gallas has changed his squad number already! He was 3 at the Start of the week, he now has number 10

Whats that all about!!

A defender with no 10?

G|mp · 5 Sep 2006 at 20:50

Gooner14 said:
For some odd reason Gallas has changed his squad number already! He was 3 at the Start of the week, he now has number 10

Whats that all about!!

Hes playing up front cuz your strikers are ****

Mr_L · 5 Sep 2006 at 20:56

G|mp said:
Hes playing up front cuz your strikers are ****

That explains why Boulahrouz has got No 9 at Chelsea then.

HangTime · 5 Sep 2006 at 23:20

Gooner14 said:
For some odd reason Gallas has changed his squad number already! He was 3 at the Start of the week, he now has number 10

Whats that all about!!

Probably something to do with him not wanting to play leftback I'd imagine. Yeah OK, so shirt numbers mean bugger all these days, but it's probably something psychological along those lines.

Gooner14 · 5 Sep 2006 at 23:22

HangTime said:
Probably something to do with him not wanting to play leftback I'd imagine. Yeah OK, so shirt numbers mean bugger all these days, but it's probably something psychological along those lines.

Perhaps. But he will have to play at LB until Clichy or Ralph are fit. Hoyte isn't a LB.

HangTime · 5 Sep 2006 at 23:29

Indeed, he gets caught out of position and I thought his inexperience showed when he gave away that penno.

Clichy, Lauren and Senderos are all out of action for over a month at least, so it will be interesting to see what he makes of being forced to play LB. Ironically had he stayed at Chelsea, he'd probably be more likely of playing in his favoured CB role thanks to the arrival of Cole

NokkonWud · 6 Sep 2006 at 01:21

BaZ87 said:
IMO he is better than Carvalho, you said you would take Toure over him (fair enough, i don't agree though) but who's the other CB at Arsenal that would stop him getting into there team?

I never named Arsenal in my list of teams he wouldn't start in

. Senderos was excellent at the world cup, however I do think Gallas is a better CB than him.