Permabanned
Son dive
Have to admit, it looked off to me. Was the angle on Amazon the camera angle the VAR team are using? If so, it wasn't a very accurate angle to use.
Id love to see a ruler used for this one. Very quick to decide it was on...
Don't understand the complaining about the offside. Anything that marginal is either going to **** off one side or the other depending which way it goes. You win some and you lose some. If its that close there is a little bit of luck in it.
We've seen Liverpool goals chalked off after a couple of minutes of video reviews yet that was close and given within seconds.Don't understand the complaining about the offside. Anything that marginal is either going to **** off one side or the other depending which way it goes. You win some and you lose some. If its that close there is a little bit of luck in it.
Because every other week var gives a different answer that's why people get ****** off with itDon't understand the complaining about the offside. Anything that marginal is either going to **** off one side or the other depending which way it goes. You win some and you lose some. If its that close there is a little bit of luck in it.
Because the technology isn't consistently used
What would you like to see? You want the decision to take the same amount of time each go? Exactly the same graphic?
What was inconsistent? Did they use the wrong part of the players body?
Because other goals (Salah, Bamford for example) get chalked off after minutes spent with compasses and protractors, whereas that one was just a cursory look and given. Frankly I think today's was done right but it has to be consistent.Don't understand the complaining about the offside. Anything that marginal is either going to **** off one side or the other depending which way it goes. You win some and you lose some. If its that close there is a little bit of luck in it.