Only DM will slate arsenal's result and performance yesterday.
For me we played decently. not amazing but good. Carzola was great and i cant believe you are critising him from his shots ouside the box when the majority of them are always on target.
he is great outside the box and his long range shots are pretty accurate and works the goalie every time.
Walcott did ok. nothing special but its too early to make a judgement. let him play in that position for 4-5 games in a row to make a fair judgement on whether he is ready for that position..
Gibbs and Sagna was awful defensively.But i have seen worse from man united yet everytime arsenal let a goal in, we get labeled as the most awful defensive team in the world.
Diddnt ManU let in 3 against Reading not too long ago?
Point is DM, every club makes poor defensive errors. everyone does and the way to judge how bad a defense is is to look at how many they have conceded.
the more u conceded the weaker your defence is at "defending" a goal.
Firstly the more goals you concede the weaker your defence is, in the last 3 season alone, 2 of them we conceded within a goal 50% more than Utd.... we have a worse defence. This season we haven't played a whole season, if Utd concede more than us and we concede the same as we have in previous seasons... it will because they got worse, not we got better.
As for Santi, over the season the MASSIVE majority of his long range shots have NOT been on target, I have no idea what player you're watching. He's taken 59 shots and had 22 on target, before last night that was 54 shots and 18 on target with 4 goals, or a pretty awful return.
He "always" works the keeper is, ridiculous to say the least. I can only off the top of my head remember one goal from a long range shot. Last night was about the only time he scored a high percentage of his shots, all deep inside the box, two in the 6 yard box.
AS for Walcott, it doesn't actually matter where he is supposed to be playing, 90% of any of the real work he does in most games is in the same position as he played last night. He frequently messes up those one on ones when through on goal. 90% of the time he has to do more than one touch then shoot he screws it up.
I also didn't slate them many players were vastly improved, I simply said I don't know if its only down to how awful Reading were, because its very hard to tell. We won the first half 3-0, reading didn't show up, Reading played SOME football in the second half and we drew the second 2-2.... even in their best spells Reading weren't very good at all.... you really don't find that worrying?
What has happened for YEARS, Arsenal suck for 5 games, Arsenal fans start to question Wenger, we thrash some POS team and everyone "believes" again. When you don't analyse your mistakes when you're winning, you'll continue to make mistakes, and those mistakes will cost you points. This is Arsenal, Wenger and Arsenal fans problem, when we win "nothing is wrong", then when we lose no one seems to understand why, least of all Wenger. Because people pretend the problems aren't there when we win. When you get a win, that is all that matters and you don't try to improve from there to win "better", well, that is why Arsenal have declined for 8 years.
Fergie repeatedly will win a game and say they played crap, say they made mistakes, say they need to work on problem X Y and Z, and their fans notice the mistakes and awful performances in wins, and that team wins title after title.
Arsenal fans/Wenger win a game and praise everyone, complain about nothing, ignore every mistake and don't try and improve, bad performances are ignored.... and we win nothing, after nothing, after nothing.
Fundamental difference, Utd as a club consistently tries to improve, Arsenal do not.