Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 33,188
Ive heard this line so many times and it still makes no sense.
"We had £35m to spend but no real strikers worth that amount would come to us so we spent £35m on one that would".
That is what you are effectively saying and its complete madness.
The argument always was that Torres was 50mil, everyone knew Liverpool got at least 10-20mil more than they should have for an increasingly dodgey looking Torres. This reflected directly in the price Newcastle could get.
Same way Nasri is only worth 15-20mil, with one year left on his contract you'd normally be lucky to get 8mil, we got 24mil.
Cahill is worth 15mil MAYBE(if he is as good as rated), in the last year of his contract, you'd think 5-6mil, but they know Arsenal just got an extra 16mil for a player who wasn't worth anywhere near that, so Bolton are basically saying, if you get full price for Nasri, and the contract makes no difference, it won't here either.