So you think this is acceptable in football
he's avoiding that one but bans for diving is a must
So you think this is acceptable in football
I didn't say that. Violent conduct is a 3 game ban, whether you rub noses or punch a player and a red in an under 23s game results in a suspension for under 23 games.So you think this is acceptable in football
I didn't say that. Violent conduct is a 3 game ban, whether you rub noses or punch a player and a red in an under 23s game results in a suspension for under 23 games.
Well if that's the case it's wrong .not your fault but Liverpool hopefully will fine him to the maximum as hes let them downI didn't say that. Violent conduct is a 3 game ban, whether you rub noses or punch a player and a red in an under 23s game results in a suspension for under 23 games.
It was a stupid reaction. Who knows whether we'll fine him but the reality is that any action they can take (I believe the max fine they can give is 2 weeks) will be meaningless.Well if that's the case it's wrong .not your fault but Liverpool hopefully will fine him to the maximum as hes let them down
That last ten minutes was a real delight to watch, where have all the Chelsea supporters been this season as well.
Lets not go too far. They're still in the CL spots, not a relegation battle. Every time you think Conte/Chelsea are about to implode they string together a few wins again.
Like I said though, every time you think Conte's on the brink he pulls a few wins out and we start again. You only have to think back to last September, there was a lot of talk that he was about to be sacked then too....At this point the 2 wins in 10 in all competitions is absolutely as bad as things were under Mourinho when he got fired.
**** knows with Chelsea but as I said, there was a lot of speculation that he was getting sacked before they went on that winning run last season. IIRC there were even reports saying he had actually been sacked.You think that because he had 2 losses in 5 games that he was almost getting the sack last year, lol.
The offside rule's always been a mess but it's instances like this that take it beyond a joke. Lovren 100% has to try to intercept that ball to Kane as he cannot know if Kane is offside or whether the official will flag for it. Kane's clearly interfered with play (literally speaking) and gained an advantage. 99 times out of 100 Kane's given offside there and the officials say it wasn't a deliberate action by Lovren to deflect the ball backwards, which is what Keith Hackett's said applied here:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football...assistants-par-anfield-spurs-did-not-deserve/
Again, the big issue with today isn't the decisions made but how they've been made and what's been shown on MOTD is pretty damning for Moss. He's seen clearly trying to get help from TV replays and despite having to be 100% sure to award a pen or send a player off, he's openly admitted to guessing on the first penalty decision.
Keith Hackett has called for the International Football Association Board to clarify the rules and also for a full investigation into Moss:The offiside rule is now a complete mess. If they want to make an exception, the defensive player should only be able to play an offensive player back onside if he comes into actual possession of the ball.