Permabanned
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2012
- Posts
- 584
^ that is irrelevant though.
Its irrelevant to the decision, its not irrelevant to me laughing at the shocking state of their commentary this match
^ that is irrelevant though.
I'm not overly fussed about which is more dangerous. If you're strictly following the letter of the law regarding endangering the opponent then both the attacker and keeper are risking getting sent off in that situation. At the speed both are travelling, if they don't win the ball and end up smashing into the other, they're risking injuring them.
As a supporter, whether of the defensive or attacking side, you're not going to be happy if your player pulls out of that challenge. Mane has to go for the ball because he has a goal on a plate for him if he gets there and equally Ederson has to go for it to stop Mane having a one on one.
I'd be surprised. We've seen plenty of examples of the attacking player clattering into the keeper like Mane did without being sent off let alone defenders doing it.
Its irrelevant to the decision, its not irrelevant to me laughing at the shocking state of their commentary this match
Clattenburg's said it wasn't a red by the letter of the law although he allowed De Jong to try and split Alonso in half and probably jerks off to Mortal Kombat fatalities.
Pep isn't even sure it was a red because Mane wasn't looking at him.Surprised so many people saying it wasn't a red. He's out of control, boot high and ends up kicking the goalie in the face. If that's not red, what is these days?
He played in second half and I didn't notice him but then I don't think during that half I noticed any of our players5-0 thrashing eh :embarrassed:
Ermm how did Ox do?? If he played that is??.