Greta Thunberg

Turns out the anti Greta is a Stefan Molyneux fan, literally the most predictable thing ever, at least she's learnt her grift from a master.

She'll do well. The right will lap her up in the same many on the left have lapped up Greta.

I look forward to these two intellectual powerhouses going up against each other
 
Turns out the anti Greta is a Stefan Molyneux fan . . .
Just in case anyone doesn't know who Stefan Molyneux is (I didn't), his Wikipedia page reads thus:
Stefan Molyneux is a far-right, white nationalist Canadian podcaster and YouTuber who is known for his promotion of scientific racism and white supremacist views.

Molyneux is described as a leading figure of the alt-right movement by Politico and The Washington Post, and as a far-right activist. Tom Clements in The Independent described Molyneux as having "a perverse fixation on race and IQ".

The Freedomain internet community which Molyneux leads has been described as a cult, and Molyneux has been described as a cult leader, using cult indoctrination techniques on his followers.
I can see why Greta Thunberg's international recognition might upset him ;)
 
Yes Stephen Molyneux must be a right wing racist for pointing out that the average IQ for oriental people is higher than white western people.
 
Turns out the anti Greta is a Stefan Molyneux fan, literally the most predictable thing ever, at least she's learnt her grift from a master.

She'll do well. The right will lap her up in the same many on the left have lapped up Greta.

I look forward to these two intellectual powerhouses going up against each other

IMO she isn't an activist like Greta, Greta seems to have came about because she genuinely cares about the issue (whether you agree or not she genuinely seems to believe) whereas the other lass is so obviously a media creation in response it's so painfully obvious.
 
If that was the only thing he had done that lead to him being labeled a white nationalist you might have a point.
Genuinely interested. What else has he done to be labelled it. I see he is indeed labelled it by some. But labels are easy to throw about. I don't trust labels now without understanding the basis behind them. So why is he labelled it if, in the example I mentioned, he says one non-white group has a higher average IQ than his own racial group. Interested in his other actions.
 
There's no point in a debate nowadays, everyone is too stupid to appreciate it, just enjoy your comfy rage filled echo chambers, all people have the attention and cerebrality for is banal three word slogans.
 
Genuinely interested. What else has he done to be labelled it. I see he is indeed labelled it by some. But labels are easy to throw about. I don't trust labels now without understanding the basis behind them. So why is he labelled it if, in the example I mentioned, he says one non-white group has a higher average IQ than his own racial group. Interested in his other actions.
It might help if you managed to spell his name correct I suppose.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefan_Molyneux

I'm not at all keen on Stefan Molyneux, but to claim he's a white supremacist is utter nonsense.

Proof that anyone can edit Wikipedia I suppose.
Its all easily checkable.
 
Well considering you know who I am talking about then it's really not important. But I am genuinely interested in his actions which caused him to be labelled alt right racist or whatever?
I meant I can see why you might have been confused. The first name you gave him was the creator of Theme Park the gamer. So not surprised you were confused.

If you are that interested why dont you google him or read the wiki page and start there?

Im not sure if you are saying he has the same sort of views as you so that cant make him a white nationalist. Im going to be honest with you it doesnt mean he isnt.
 
Its all easily checkable.

You're right.

I've watched videos in which he's claimed both Jewish (a specific group thereof, at least) and Asian people have a higher average IQ than whites.

Definitely not a white supremacist.

He may well have a number of faults, but that isn't one of them.

The 'white supremacist' sources on Wiki link back to him claiming the Notre Dame fire may have been a result of Islamic extremism, hardly an indication of the claim.
 
Look guys just because he has the same sort of views as you does not mean he isnt a white nationalist or racist. It means something completely different.

Im sure they are not views you are ashamed of.
 
You're a good example of why I avoid politically motivated threads Tony.

You know nothing about me or my views other than the fact I've stated he is not a white supremacist, yet you're leaping to conclusions based upon that while still enjoying assumptions about someone that are clearly untrue.

You are welcome to dislike the man, there's many reasons to dislike him, as I stated myself earlier I'm not keen on him. I would recommend having genuine reasons for such over base assumptions and poorly accredited sources.
 
I meant I can see why you might have been confused. The first name you gave him was the creator of Theme Park the gamer. So not surprised you were confused.

If you are that interested why dont you google him or read the wiki page and start there?
Yes I typed Peter before correcting it a minute later with Stephan/Stephen/Stefan/whatever because the game creator is more know to me since my Amiga days, causing a silly typo. But I am not sure why you are fixated on my getting his name wrong. We both know who I am referring to. Let's move on from that.

I have looked at the wiki page you linked to. But again it just keep calling him alt/extreme right, racist, etc. Or just quotes other people and organisations saying he is. But I can't see any actual evidence in there. This is the point I was making with saying I don't trust someone being labelled nowadays without seeing actual evidence. Being called something doesn't mean that person is it. He may well be. Or he may not be. But I can't see any evidence in that page apart from labels.

Happy to Google him more, but this discussion was started when you said his 'other actions' are the reason he has the label. So I was hoping you had the evidence I was looking for rather than just suggesting I google for it. Again it just seems like a label thrown at him without evidence.

As I said, he may be or may not be. I don't know. But so far in this discussion I haven't seen any evidence to support the label.
 
No one cares about ******* IQ scores, the whole idea of it is inherently dumb and antagonistic.

Irrelevant.

Molyneux clearly believes they have some value, the fact he believes others (non-whites) may be smarter than whites on average, is absolute evidence against any claims of him being a white supremacist, period.
 
Back
Top Bottom