We should have gone nuclear 40 years ago.
I honestly see this has the only way forward for humanity, but the uneducated anti-nuclear hippies in the 70's and 80's made it a taboo word.
We should have gone nuclear 40 years ago.
And then we've had the regressive right denying climate change ever since, calling it a liberal hoax, which has seriously stymied the world's efforts and reactions.
She should go and talk to mr putin about pollution mite find a little chemical perfume as a gift.
Energy storage is (typically) expensive so until that changes, the majority of renewables (wind and solar especially) will purely be supplementary rather than direct replacements.
As others have said, we should have invested in nuclear.
If the grid doesn't want any more supply and the turbines are providing, then without storage, it's just wasted. Storage improvements are vital to making environmentally powered energy supply more effective.You don't need "storage" in wind energy supplied power grids - the energy flow is direct from the wind turbines farm to the consumers.
If the grid doesn't want any more supply and the turbines are providing, then without storage, it's just wasted. Storage improvements are vital to making environmentally powered energy supply more effective.
Yes, also what happens when it is a calm day with no wind. The system needs redundancy either through storage or backup supply which is currently fossil fuels.
If the grid doesn't want any more supply
There are no calm days "without" wind in the North Sea
You have no idea what you are talking about.There are no calm days "without" wind in the North Sea
You switch the fossil fuels (coal power plants) OFF, and the freed energy needs are delivered by the wind.
So, what you describe is simply wrong and it doesn't work like you want it to work.
Current? Yes. Guess what, weather changes.
Over the North Sea it is almost constant, maybe 99% of the time!
Do you know what the North Sea is?
Over the North Sea it is almost constant, maybe 99% of the time!
Do you know what the North Sea is?
I cant tell if you are serious or not? Surely you cant be this dense?
I am seriously disturbed by your wrong postings!
Then this graph would be almost straight line.maybe 99% of the time
Here's a profile of UK wind generation over the last year.
Are you trolling?
Over the North Sea it is almost constant, maybe 99% of the time!
Err no.