Greta Thunberg

right and that is not going to happen as her handlers know damn well.

she is a young asd lassie getting abused by asses? am i right?

also what is her master plan for doing this, how can she go about this, and remember your talking to some one that is autistic and cuts up all the plastic rings into shreds, incase birds or dolphins or fish get caught,,,,,, please tell me the master plan.]

edit: do we need more nuke plants?
 
VincentHanna said:
Threatened by a 16 year old girl?

Ok.
Click to expand...

Ageism and sexism in one short sentence. Well done, you are winning at being fashionably prejudiced.

Whether or not someone is threatening has nothing to do with their age. It's about their power (of which she has a great deal), their accountability (of which she has none), their empathy for other people (hers is limited, either by her mental illness or by her devout ideology or by her irrational prejudice or a combination of the three) and their knowledge of what does harm (her knowledge of most things is limited).

Her age and sex are a godsend to her followers and to anyone who wants to use her. She can be simultaneously cast as an infant who cannot be criticised at all, a messiah of innocence and purity and as the font of all wisdom. More power than almost all adults and less responsibility and accountability than most children. A perfect combination for either a tyrant or a tool.
 
Angilion said:
Whether or not someone is threatening has nothing to do with their age. It's about their power (of which she has a great deal), their accountability (of which she has none), their empathy for other people (hers is limited, either by her mental illness or by her devout ideology or by her irrational prejudice or a combination of the three) and their knowledge of what does harm (her knowledge of most things is limited).

Her age and sex are a godsend to her followers and to anyone who wants to use her. She can be simultaneously cast as an infant who cannot be criticised at all, a messiah of innocence and purity and as the font of all wisdom. More power than almost all adults and less responsibility and accountability than most children. A perfect combination for either a tyrant or a tool.
Click to expand...

Careful - bit too much clarity for GD.
 
Angilion said:
Ageism and sexism in one short sentence. Well done, you are winning at being fashionably prejudiced.

Whether or not someone is threatening has nothing to do with their age. It's about their power (of which she has a great deal), their accountability (of which she has none), their empathy for other people (hers is limited, either by her mental illness or by her devout ideology or by her irrational prejudice or a combination of the three) and their knowledge of what does harm (her knowledge of most things is limited).

Her age and sex are a godsend to her followers and to anyone who wants to use her. She can be simultaneously cast as an infant who cannot be criticised at all, a messiah of innocence and purity and as the font of all wisdom. More power than almost all adults and less responsibility and accountability than most children. A perfect combination for either a tyrant or a tool.
Click to expand...

i agree :)
 
Roar87 said:
Really, no one's doing anything about it? Ok. No one is doing anything.
Click to expand...

The issue is not fast enough. A lot of the UK's approach to its target for 2050 is basically offload anything polluting to other countries so they can claim reductions and hitting their targets.

Reason being the solutions which are available cost money.
 
It's time the world finally accepted that nuclear power is by far the most sustainable for of energy we have in our arsenal; I'd like to see the government commit to building five or six new power stations over the next decade, not just Hinkley Point. Nuclear technology has come a long way since the 80's, and it would help the country meet it's targets without having to fudge them by offloading to poorer countries.
 
Angilion said:
Ageism and sexism in one short sentence. Well done, you are winning at being fashionably prejudiced.

Whether or not someone is threatening has nothing to do with their age. It's about their power (of which she has a great deal), their accountability (of which she has none), their empathy for other people (hers is limited, either by her mental illness or by her devout ideology or by her irrational prejudice or a combination of the three) and their knowledge of what does harm (her knowledge of most things is limited).

Her age and sex are a godsend to her followers and to anyone who wants to use her. She can be simultaneously cast as an infant who cannot be criticised at all, a messiah of innocence and purity and as the font of all wisdom. More power than almost all adults and less responsibility and accountability than most children. A perfect combination for either a tyrant or a tool.
Click to expand...
The very first two responses in this thread illustrate the sexism and misogyny of her detractors. And yours illustrates the ignorance of neuro-atypical conditions ("mental illness").

Her age, sex and Aspergers seem to be more of a 'godsend' to morons, frankly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom