What I said there is also true, you are just picking and choosing parts of what I posted in what you quote to suit your agenda.
Greta Thunberg
- Thread starter rubberduck
- Start date
What I said there is also true, you are just picking and choosing parts of what I posted in what you quote to suit your agenda.
No. I'm picking the full paragraph that I originally quoted. And it's not true, we've both just been through this. All the links, including those you posted show you're wrong!
No they don't lol, read it again.
Yes. They do. I don't think you understand per capita vs a whole population. Go back and look at the first link I posted. It breaks it down in to words even you should understand (I quoted the figures directly for you).
You are incorrect, sorry. You seriously need to re-read everything. I think you have completely missed my point because I never said anything about per capita for any of my points, that is a term you used.
Lol. And here we have the problem folks. People who are too limited in intellect to understand the problem, hence why we have one.
High income
Year 2014
CO2 emissions per capita 10.9
Low income
2014
0.3
Grimm: "Poor people produce more!"
Read my edited post, thanks.
I mean, I explained myself here:
But don't let that get in the way of you making a fool of yourself.
Here are the relevant pieces of information:
and:
How many of those countries do you think care about what Greta Thunberg has to say? I'd say maybe USA, Germany and Canada if you are lucky... Per capita stats don't even seem relevant at this stage. What happens when India catches on and starts becoming more industrial and consumerist?
Last edited:
Ah, the one where you realised you'd spoken complete tripe so had to amend it?
Which is AGAIN talking about countries as a whole, not per capita and AGAIN proves your original point wrong.
I'll help you out and quote my whole post again seeing as you like picking and choosing individual words...
Again nothing I have said here is incorrect, you are just embarrassing yourself again.
I will again re-iterate, you are the one banging on about "per capita" not me...
Read my edited post, thanks.
I mean, I explained myself here:
But don't let that get in the way of you making a fool of yourself.
Here are the relevant pieces of information:
and:
How many of those countries do you think care about what Greta Thunberg has to say? I'd say maybe USA, Germany and Canada if you are lucky... Per capita stats don't even seem relevant at this stage. What happens when India catches on and starts becoming more industrial and consumerist?
Even if European countries do care, there isn't much else they can do at the moment.
We can't go 100% green over-night unless we want to go back to the middle ages. It's going to take a century if we're lucky and we aren't even one of the bigger polluters.
OK. You just keep thinking that...Clearly you're unable to distinguish between the individual and the mass. When debating a point the individual words matter. You referred to the individual then attempted to argue about the mass. A totally different point. As I stated previously, then people like you are around no wonder the world's screwed.
I don't even know what you are talking about anymore lol. Embarrassing. I am allowed to make different points in different posts you know?
Well we'd already established you struggle with words so that doesn't surprise me.
It makes discussing one point pretty difficult when you're debating something that nobody else is talking about...
Grimm: "No Dis, rainbows are different colours! You're wrong, omg lol you're stupid"
Other people: "Erm...we're talking about roller coasters."
Wow you are really triggered aren't you? LMAO
Why do you keep putting statements in quotes as if I have said them on here when I clearly haven't said anything of the sort?
To use them as an alternate example of how retarded your argument has been.
I see, great argument here from you, bravo old boy. Seems like your whole debating strategy against me appears to be to invent things that you wish I'd said in order for you to post a zinger to make me look bad. Am I correct?
No point in arguing with someone who can't argue, by his own admission, a single point.
I didn't admit this anywhere, want to make anything else up today?