Its not about power, it's about will.
Greta Thunberg
- Thread starter rubberduck
- Start date
-
- Tags
- doom goblin
Caporegime
You don’t care about her life and wellbeing?
Caporegime
She seems to be alive, healthy and mostly happy doing something that she's passionate about. How is her life and/or wellbeing at risk, unless of course she's at risk of being suicided?
Associate
- Joined
- 3 Oct 2014
- Posts
- 1,770
I didn't think Wind and Solar generated as much as they do, I see an ever increasing amount of houses now with solar panels.
I think just naturally over time we will crack climate change with more and more solar, wind generation and not to mention electric cars.
7% increase in one year for renewable. Its not impossible to think 10-20 years it will be double.
I think just naturally over time we will crack climate change with more and more solar, wind generation and not to mention electric cars.
7% increase in one year for renewable. Its not impossible to think 10-20 years it will be double.
Man of Honour
The girl is full of crap. She is the definition of a useful idiot, and shes been used her whole life, has been made to live in fear of something there is no supporting evidence for, and the Democrats exploit these children to push their own wicked agenda.
Luisa-Marie Neubauer is her handler. She's a member of "ONE Foundation" managed by BONO, Bill Gates and George Soros
Nice find.
I wasn't agreeing with her, I want to slap her legs but it was interesting to read why she's a brat.
Soldato
Like Dawkins for Atheism, I don't think she's the spokesperson the cause needs as she's too controversial, but I appreciate her efforts and hope she succeeds (as with Dawkins).
Man of Honour
At least Dawkins can give proper reasoned replies
Soldato
That's utter ********. You living under a rock or just trolling? https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
"Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree*: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities."
Soldato
She's 16...
Caporegime
Child: It'd be nice if older people who can effect change didn't mess up the world for my generation.
GD: SHUT UP YOU SNIVELLING TODDLER, YOU MAKE ME SICK.
Also GD: *does absolutely nothing to improve the world*
GD: SHUT UP YOU SNIVELLING TODDLER, YOU MAKE ME SICK.
Also GD: *does absolutely nothing to improve the world*
Here we go with the 97 percent agree hoax
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexep...e-scientists-agree-is-100-wrong/#4fa9013d3f9f
https://dailycaller.com/2016/02/16/propoganda-top-mit-climate-scientist-trashes-97-consensus-claim/
The report dailycaller cites:
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/1...E38DF1C0E2460F2DE6E.c4.iopscience.cld.iop.org
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/11/20/the-97-consensus-myth-busted-by-a-real-survey/
The 97% is very easy to debunk. It was done by a grad student. She sent a email to a couple hundred climate scientists asking if they believe in man made climate change. 97% of the people who responded believed in it. The title should have been 97% of people who are in the profession of climate science believe in man made climate change. It's like saying 97% of mediums believe in spirit or 97% believe that man has some impact to make the planet change in some amount. Of course they believe in it. How would they make a living other wise?
And here's a good vid explaining how they manipulate the numbers to try and show a crisis
Hew
More dislikes than likes now. How much of her overly theatrical rambling does she actually understand herself? Just seems like she was reading something written by someone else and she's just a little figurehead. "how dare you, how dare you, how dare you".
More dislikes than likes now. How much of her overly theatrical rambling does she actually understand herself? Just seems like she was reading something written by someone else and she's just a little figurehead. "how dare you, how dare you, how dare you".
Handler? Do you think this is all some ridiculous conspiracy?
What is your problem with some of the richest people on the planet using their fortunes to make the world a better place?
Seriously, is this GD or /r/TheDonald?
FML. This thread makes for some seriously depressing reading. So a teenager is trying to motivate, engage and inspire the next generation and you nutters are calling her all sorts of horrible things because climate change is a hoax and she's a "left-wing puppet"? Wow. You guys need to get out more.
Of course she's not a one-man-band, but how does that discredit everything she is doing? How is the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation or Soros in any way a negative thing?
That's like saying 100% of Oncologists believe in cancer because it lets them make a living. There's observable evidence that the climate is changing and the only variable that can explain it is us. Climate scientists believe it because they've studied it at a high level, they are the experts.
https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
Soldato
Ok fair point, I've read the Forbes one from your list. Even if that stat was/is complete and utter ********, it doesn't take a scientist to understand that global emissions are a massive problem. Fossil fuels are finite, fossil fuel pollution is a huge health problem (exhaust emissions, coal power stations etc), and a huge environmental problem for other species critical to our survival. And that's just the tip of the iceberg. There are so many reasons to move away from fossil fuels (and meat - which I haven't touched on). Maybe that's why it makes sense for Greta do spearhead this movement after all.
Looking further at the Forbes link, it's written by a biased Fossil Fuels advocate. Great.
And a slightly newer article, whilst disputing the 97% figure, still puts the figure at around 90%. https://www.forbes.com/sites/uhener...97-consensus-on-anthropogenic-climate-change/ - Written by less biaseded authers too.
Last edited: