I just get the feeling when they say "it wont be a blanket shutdown like last time" what they really mean is " there's no way this will close Heathrow again"
That's just not true. As was agreed after last time there has to be certification from the engine manufacturers in order to fly in a Volcanic ash temporary danger area...which Ryanair DOES NOT HAVE!
Not my words...words of General Manager of London Terminal control.
Grimsvotn isn't the real problem, Katla is. The last bunch of times Eyfjallajökull has erupted, so has Katla not long thereafter. And it's pretty big.
That's just not true. As was agreed after last time there has to be certification from the engine manufacturers in order to fly in a Volcanic ash temporary danger area...which Ryanair DOES NOT HAVE!
Not my words...words of General Manager of London Terminal control.
Sky just interviewed O'Leary from Ryanair
He says the ash cloud is mythical and based on pure speculation from the met office charts, the engine and air frame manufacturers have said there would be no issues at these levels and that the CAA has gone back on it agreement to let airlines make the decisions
Grimsvotn isn't the real problem, Katla is. The last bunch of times Eyfjallajökull has erupted, so has Katla not long thereafter. And it's pretty big.
[TW]Fox;19211155 said:10+ hours? I somehow doubt that.
He’ll do anything to get people on board. I wonder what excuse he’ll use when one goes down.
Sky just interviewed O'Leary from Ryanair
He says the ash cloud is mythical and based on pure speculation from the met office charts, the engine and air frame manufacturers have said there would be no issues at these levels and that the CAA has gone back on it agreement to let airlines make the decisions
But a CAA spokesperson said: "The CAA can confirm that at no time did a Ryanair flight enter the notified area of high contamination ash over Scotland this morning."
It would appear ryanair submitted stuff to the CAA hours ago, after their test flights and the reports of both the engine and plane folks with it.
This should enable them to fly when the CAA go through the data and approve or reject the findings.
The CAA has taken hours to come to a decision, and in fact still hasn't, their latest announcement being they are still reviewing data.
No offense they've had ayear to get ready for this, it doesn't matter how much data they are sent, they should have their own systems in place, and have their own levels of acceptable ready, if they are incapable of producing quicker decisions when 6 hours of weather will change the conditions then they are an organisation simply not fit for purpose.
Ben, did they mention the policy on staff being stuck abroad? I'm in the US at the minute and United have just issued a travel waiver for London bound flights so it's highly likely I might get stuck. I remember there was ambiguity around it last year.
This BA plane has been flying around in the so-called 'ash cloud' all day today. It flew up from Heathrow this morninig and spent a couple of hours or so flying around Aberdeen airport @ 28,000 feet and then went back to Manchester, It has since taken off from Manchester and flown to Newcastle Airport @ 10,000 feet. It is now heading towards Glasgow Airport @ 10,000 feet. It's obviously test flying - but it's also obviously ok. Meanwhile thousands of travellers have their lives disrupted / holidays ruined. I'm no fan of O' Leary but he might just have a point this time?