I'm enjoying this so far. However, the longer it goes, the longer I feel Hannibal, as Hannibal, is both misused and underused. What's more it feels unnecessary. I like Hannibal's dark and disturbed vibe, which is a bit more refreshing that all of the typical quirky, psychotic procedurals on TV at the moment but it's quite clear that Hannibal, the super clever man eater as we know him from cinema, is not the focus or main character and brings very little to the procedural aspect of things.
When I saw first few episodes of "Elementary" I quickly arrived at the conclusion that the show could quite easily do without calling Sherlock's character "Sherlock". In fact considering success of British "Sherlock" on US TV, the decision felt forced and odd, as the jump-to-conclusion-over-nothing and it-is-what-I-say-it-is Dr.House like figure from the show bares little if any resemblance to original deductive Holmes from books. It's quite clearly just an excuse for Holmes to have Simon Cowell's rudeness in accent adding immediate "Lie To Me" like "Houseness" about him. "Elementary" could instead just opt for turning Holmes into yet another quirky, semi psychotic monk/mentalist/psych/lie to me/perception guy.
In similar way "Hannibal"'s Hannibal doesn't quite fit the persona from Thomas Harris' novels. Harris' Hannibal would have no reason and no interest helping some random mentally disturbed redneck. Not that it matters much, since in "Hannibal" titular individual is neither a lead, nor even second strings. At best, he's a member of background ensemble, most of the time far behind others, including Fishburn's Crawford. And the true lead character of Will Graham does not really need either Hannibal or Thomas Harris' universe to be yet another quirky, semi psychotic monk/mentalist/psych/lie to me/perception guy on TV.